MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Vext - A Virtual Exercise Training Program For Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Feasibility Study.

2022· article· en· W4294816877 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nikol K. Grishin, Astrid M. De Souza, Julie Fairbairn, Eli Puterman, A. William Sheel, Jim Potts, Tom Blydt‐Hansen, Kathryn Armstrong

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyQuality of life (healthcare)QuartileTest (biology)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients report lower strength and physical activity levels than their healthy peers. Virtual exercise programs may reduce barriers to exercise and allow for additional access to specialized care. PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of an 8-week virtual exercise program (VEXT) in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: A strength-based program was designed by a clinical exercise physiologist (AD). A treadmill exercise stress test was completed prior to starting the program. Self-report surveys were used to assess quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, PedsQL), fatigue (Pediatric Quality of Life Multidimensional Fatigue Scale, PedsQL-Fatigue), and physical activity (Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents, PAQ-C/A) prior to and after completion of the program. The strength sub-test of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2) was administered virtually. Classes were conducted via Zoom (Zoom Video Communications Inc, San Jose, CA), 3 times per week for 30 minutes. Weekly engagement with the study team was provided by a web-based text messaging platform (WelTel Inc., Vancouver, BC). Medians (inter-quartile range, IQR) are reported. RESULTS: Baseline findings are reported for 12 participants (4 liver, 5 kidney, 3 heart SOT recipients; 58% females). The median age was 12 (11-14) years. PedsQL score was [69.57 (55.98-79.89); Normal: 85.66 ± 11.99]. PedsQL-Fatigue score was [66.67 (45.84-76.89); Normal: 82.19 ± 12.27]. PAQ-C/A score was [Females: 1.72 (1.27-2.11); Normal: 2.70 ± 0.63, Males: 2.87 (2.60-2.87); Normal: 3.01 ± 0.72]. The median strength subtest Z-score was -1.00 (-1.35 to -0.60). Exercise times for 10 of the participants who followed the BCCH protocol was 7.04 minutes [(5.68 - 8.86); Controls: 15.25 (13.82 - 16.75)]. The remaining 2 participants followed a modified protocol due to physical limitations. CONCLUSIONS: At baseline, pediatric SOT recipients report a lower quality of life, higher fatigue, and lower physical activity levels than healthy children. Eleven of twelve participants have a low strength score. A virtual exercise program may help to increase strength, increase physical activity levels and, in turn, may improve quality of life in these children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: Non-randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare→French-language works237,207→