MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294830384 · doi:10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2006p0609

Cracking and Spalling Behavior of WC-17% Co Cermet Coatings

2006· article· en· W4294830384 on OpenAlex
J.‐G. Legoux, S. Bouaricha, J.P. Sauer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal spray · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced materials and composites
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSpallThermal sprayingCrackingCoatingCermetComposite materialMicrostructureCarbideHot workMetallurgyScanning electron microscopeTool steel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Thermal spray WC based powders are now frequently used as chrome replacement alternatives for a wide range of industrial and aeronautical applications. In numerous cases, the carbide materials outperform the hard chrome in many property evaluations. However, their usage on highly stressed parts, especially in fatigue loading, can be limited by spalling resistance of the coating. While HVOF is being used on many flight critical parts, stringent applications like the landing gear components of carrier-based aircraft are still under investigation. This work, on WC-17%Co, relates coating bend test performance and fatigue/cyclic step loading behavior to the processing history using different HVOF systems. Initially, twelve (12) different coatings were monitored using a DPV- 2000 for temperature/velocity profiles. The mechanical properties were then assessed using an instrumented four-point bend test as well as uniaxial cyclic loading. After mechanical testing, the coating microstructures were characterized using X-Ray diffraction and electron microscopy in order to investigate the phase content and nature. In particular, the cracks generated during the bend test were measured using SEM on sample cross sections to understand characteristics such as spacing and crack penetration to the substrate. The interactions of processing parameters with the cracking/spalling resistance of the various coating deposits will be discussed and a potential criteria for the control of cracking phenomena will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it