Formation of Pores in Thermal Spray Coatings due to Incomplete Filling of Voids under Solid Particles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A three-dimensional, time-dependent numerical model of free-surface flows and heat transfer including phase change has been used to simulate the impact of a liquid droplet on a solid particle and to predict the size of the void under the solid particle caused by incomplete filling by liquid landing on top of it. The solid particle was considered to be a protrusion on the substrate. Fluid flow in the impacting liquid droplet was modeled using a finite difference solution of the Navier-Stokes equations in a 3D Cartesian coordinates assuming laminar, incompressible flow. Heat transfer in the liquid droplet was modeled by solving the energy equation, assuming densities of liquid and solid to be constant and equal to each other. The free surface of the liquid droplet was assumed to be adiabatic. The porosity in this simulation was defined as the volume of the incompletely filled void under the solid particle to the volume of the solid particle. The simulation was repeated with different process parameters, and the results showed that process parameters play significant roles in determining the amount of porosity. A correlation is found to express the porosity as a function of the process parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".