MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294831011 · doi:10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2006p0883

Photographing Impact of Plasma-Sprayed Particles on Metal Substrates

2006· article· en· W4294831011 on OpenAlexaff
Allison E. McDonald, S. Chandra, M. Lamontagne, C. Moreau

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal spray · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInconelPyrometerMaterials scienceMolybdenumSubstrate (aquarium)PlasmaThermal sprayingParticle (ecology)MetallurgyInconel 625ThermalComposite materialOpticsTemperature measurementCoatingCorrosionAlloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Plasma-sprayed, molten molybdenum particles (~40 µm diameter) were photographed during impact (with velocity ~110 m/s) on Inconel surfaces that were preheated or maintained at room temperature or 400oC. A droplet approaching the surface was sensed using a photodetector and after a known delay, a fast CCD camera was triggered to capture images of the spreading splat from the substrate front surface. A rapid two-color pyrometer was used to collect the thermal radiation from the impacting particles to follow the evolution of their temperature and size after impact. Molten molybdenum particles impacting on surfaces at room temperature disintegrated and splashed, after achieving a maximum diameter larger than 400 µm. Impact on preheated and heated Inconel produced splats with maximum diameters between 200 µm and 300 µm and with less splashing. The cooling rate of splats on the preheated Inconel was larger than that of splats on non-heated Inconel, suggesting that the splat-substrate contact was improved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThermal spraySame topicParticle Dynamics in Fluid FlowsFrench-language works237,207