MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294842701 · doi:10.1002/ps.7170

Distribution and genetic characterization of bird rape mustard (<i>Brassica rapa</i>) populations and analysis of glyphosate resistance introgression

2022· article· en· W4294842701 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Martin Laforest, Sara L. Martin, Brahim Soufiane, Katherine Bisaillon, Lydia Maheux, Sylvain Fortin, Tracey James, David Miville, Annie Marcoux, Marie‐Josée Simard

Bibliographic record

VenuePest Management Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetically Modified Organisms Research
Canadian institutionsRoyal Canadian Mounted PoliceMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'AlimentationCégep Saint-Jean-sur-RichelieuAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsIntrogressionBrassica rapaBiologyGlyphosateRapeseedBrassicaCanolaDiamondback mothHybridAgronomyResistance (ecology)GeneticsBotanyGenePlutella

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The introgression of a transgene conferring glyphosate resistance from Brassica napus (rapeseed, canola) to Brassica rapa weeds (bird rape) was documented at a single location in 2007. In 2015, several cases of glyphosate resistant mustard were reported by growers in areas where rapeseed was seldom grown. RESULTS: Survey result indicated glyphosate resistant bird rape mustard is present in areas where glyphosate tolerant corn and soybean are often grown in rotation. Genetic analyses reveal that hybridization followed by introgression and progressive loss of chromosome is the likely mechanism for the horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of glyphosate resistance. CONCLUSION: Introgression of the glyphosate-resistance conferring transgene in the populations studied appears to have occurred several times, consistent with the ease for B. rapa to form hybrids with B. napus. The introduction of a transgene into a crop should therefore take into account the weediness of the species that share a common genome and their ability to form hybrids. We provide here such an example between B. napus and B. rapa, and potentially between B. napus and Raphanistrum raphanistrum. © 2022 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Pest Management Science © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePest Management ScienceSame topicGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchFrench-language works237,207