Sexual reproduction and auxospore development in the diatom Biddulphia biddulphiana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phylogenetic relationships among mediophycean diatoms with elliptical valve outline and elevated apices have long been a subject of interest and debate, particularly with respect to their relationship to pennates. However, results remain inconclusive, whether based on vegetative valve morphology, reproduction, or molecular phylogenetic data. Searching for phylogenetically informative features, we re-examined sexual reproduction, auxospore structure and development in the diatom Biddulphia biddulphiana. Several unique or unusual features and processes characterized its sexual reproduction. A unique spermatogenesis occurs with premeiotic separation of an anucleate protoplast containing all chloroplasts and likely other organelles. Additionally, their auxospore walls are some of the most complex documented, retaining earlier deposited layers that obscure layers formed during later stages of development. The oldest layer consists of thick, mostly organic incunabulum, underlain by outer and inner epizonia and finally transverse (TP) and longitudinal (LP) perizonia. The complexity of the fine structure of these layers is unprecedented. The orientation of some TP bands is also unique in mediophytes, with some perpendicular to the auxospore apical axis, parallel to each other, and open with aligned ends, as typically seen in pennates. The TP also contains rings slanting toward the apices, as in some other mediophytes, e.g., eupodiscaceans. However, both eupodiscaceans and biddulphiaceans show perizonial band structure derived from anastomosing radial scales, thus termed "scaly bands". Pinnate TP bands, common among pennate auxospores, were not found. Thus B. biddulphiana auxospore wall structure contains a mixture of characters specific to this clone but also known from mediophytes and araphid pennates. However, these features do not provide unequivocal evidence that this or the other Biddulphia species examined to date are the closest extant relatives of basal araphid pennates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".