MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295007695 · doi:10.3390/plants11182337

GmSWEET29 and Paralog GmSWEET34 Are Differentially Expressed between Soybeans Grown in Eastern and Western Canada

2022· article· en· W4295007695 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Julia Hooker, Nour Nissan, Doris Luckert, Gerardo Zapata, Anfu Hou, Ramona M. Mohr, Aaron J. Glenn, Brent Barlow, Ketema Daba, Thomas D. Warkentin, François Lefebvre, Ashkan Golshani, Elroy R. Cober, Bahram Samanfar

Bibliographic record

VenuePlants · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanOntario GenomicsCarleton UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanadian Field Crop Research Alliance
KeywordsBiologyGeneAgricultureProtein expressionGenotypeGeneticsGeographyBotanyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past two decades soybeans grown in western Canada have persistently had lower seed protein than those grown in eastern Canada. To understand the discrepancy in seed protein content between eastern- and western-grown soybeans, RNA-seq and differential expression analysis have been investigated. Ten soybean genotypes, ranging from low to high in seed protein content, were grown in four locations across eastern (Ottawa) and western (Morden, Brandon, and Saskatoon) Canada. Differential expression analysis revealed 34 differentially expressed genes encoding Glycine max Sugars Will Eventually be Exported Transporters (GmSWEETs), including paralogs GmSWEET29 and GmSWEET34 (AtSWEET2 homologs) that were consistently upregulated across all ten genotypes in each of the western locations over three years. GmSWEET29 and GmSWEET34 are likely candidates underlying the lower seed protein content of western soybeans. GmSWEET20 (AtSWEET12 homolog) was downregulated in the western locations and may also play a role in lower seed protein content. These findings are valuable for improving soybean agriculture in western growing regions, establishing more strategic and efficient agricultural practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlantsSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207