Low density polyethylene composites based on flax fibers modified by a combination of coupling agent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This investigation proposes a natural fiber surface modification approach based on the use of a system of coupling agents (CAs) to improve the mechanical properties of polymer composites made of flax fibers and low‐density polyethylene. This system combines the coating of the NaOH treated (mercerized) flax fibers by a CA (Epolene C18 [M‐C18]) in a solution under moderated heat (70°C–80°C), followed by the addition of 1% or 3% wt. of another CA (Epolene E43 [M‐E43]) during the injection molding. The comparison between the solution modified and the neat and mercerized flax fibers using scanning electron micrograph (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and density underscored some differences ascribed to the presence of M‐C18 onto the modified fibers. The mechanical properties showed that the combination of solution modification and direct introduction during the injection‐molding step of 1% of M‐E43 was efficient as the corresponding composites exhibited an improvement of 9.1%, 15.9%, and 11.1% of his tensile, flexural, and impact strengths respectively compared to the neat fiber composite. Due to their good impact and flexural strengths, these composites can be suitable for automotive parts such as keyboard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".