MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295094370 · doi:10.2196/40954

Technology-Based Innovative Health Care Solutions for Improving Maternal and Child Health Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

2022· article· en· W4295094370 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Obaidur Rahman, Noyuri Yamaji, Daichi Suzuki, Kiriko Sasayama, Daisuke Yoneoka, Erika Ota

Bibliographic record

VenueIproceedings · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychological interventionRandomized controlled trialPopulationRelative riskMeta-analysisHealth careEnvironmental healthConfidence intervalNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Technology-based health care interventions (TBIs) are being considered as a promising solution to effectively strengthen maternal and child health (MCH) service uptake in resource-limited settings. Objective This study aimed to identify the most effective TBIs that could achieve the best functional MCH outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods A comprehensive search was performed in January 2021. In all, 2 independent researchers identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) implemented in LMICs using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes framework: Population: healthy pregnant women; Intervention: TBIs; Comparison: usual care or non-TBIs; and Outcomes: MCH outcomes. We estimated the direct, indirect, and relative effects, with their certainty based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development, and Evaluations approach, for a wide range of MCH outcomes. Results In total, 30 trials with 70,807 participants were included, and 80% had low risk of bias. Our network meta-analysis (NMA) estimates indicated that TBIs, particularly SMS text messaging or phone call with mobile voucher interventions, were likely to be effective in improving MCH outcomes. The 1-way communication intervention was likely to be the most effective for the uptake of ≥4 antenatal care visits (relative risk [RR] 1.81, 95% CI 1.33-2.45; moderate certainty), facility delivery (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.91; moderate certainty), early breastfeeding initiation (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.37; moderate certainty), and caesarean delivery (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.84-0.91; low certainty) outcomes; however, 2-way communication intervention was likely to be the most effective for the skilled birth attendance (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.14-1.63; low certainty), maternal (RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.05-3.96; very low certainty) and infant’s postnatal care use (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.19-2.04; low certainty), exclusive breastfeeding practice (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.14-2.05; moderate certainty), and perinatal death (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.83; low certainty) outcomes. There was no substantial inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence, but small study effects were detected in the NMA. Conclusions Different forms of TBIs have a possibility to improve MCH outcomes in LMICs and can be integrated into the existing health systems based on their priorities. This study suggests the implementation of large-scale, well-designed RCTs in low-income countries due to the limited number of RCTs in the NMA. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42021239185; https://tinyurl.com/yuvmp35x

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIproceedingsSame topicMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207