MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295125846 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac134

Beyond the White Pill: Advocating for Racial Diversity in IBD Trials

2022· article· en· W4295125846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversity (politics)Clinical trialMedicineWhite (mutation)Inflammatory bowel diseasePopulationClinical PracticePillAlternative medicineDiseaseUlcerative colitisIntensive care medicineFamily medicineInternal medicineNursingPolitical sciencePathologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] affects an increasingly diverse patient population, most patients in IBD clinical trials are White. Acknowledging current barriers and taking meaningful action is required at multiple levels to improve racial diversity across clinical trials in IBD. Ultimately, improving racial diversity in trials can in turn improve the care received by the diverse patients seen in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it