MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295182681 · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-22-0026.1

Density Altitude: Climatology of Daily Maximum Values and Evaluation of Approximations for General Aviation

2022· article· en· W4295182681 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWeather Climate and Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumidityEnvironmental scienceAltitude (triangle)Density of airDew pointMeteorologyRange (aeronautics)AviationAtmospheric sciencesRelative humidityEffects of high altitude on humansClimatologyGeographyMathematicsEngineeringGeologyAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Density altitude (DA) is an aviation parameter that helps determine specific aircraft performance characteristics for the expected atmospheric conditions. However, there are currently no detailed graphical tools for general aviation (GA) pilot education demonstrating the spatial and temporal variation of DA to help improve situational awareness. In this study, the fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts atmospheric reanalysis of the global climate (ERA5) dataset is used to construct a 30-yr monthly climatology of DA for the conterminous United States. Several DA characteristics are also investigated, including the effect of humidity on DA, the determination of reasonable worst-case conditions, and the applicability of two DA rules of thumb (ROTs). Maximum values of DA (worst aircraft performance) occur during July, reaching 3600 m over areas with high surface elevations. Humidity, while tertiary to the effects of temperature and pressure, causes the DA to increase from their dry values by more than 140 m as far north as the U.S.-Canada border. The dry DA ROT performs well for all conditions outside of strong tropical cyclones, where GA flights would not be expected. The ROT to correct for the effects of humidity performs well except in high elevations or when the dewpoint temperatures fall outside the applicable range of ≥5°C. When applied outside this range, in some situations, DA errors can be greater than if no humidity correction were applied. Therefore, a new ROT to correct for humidity is introduced here that extends the applicable dewpoint temperature range to ≥−28°C and reduces errors in estimated DA. Significance Statement The impacts of density altitude on aircraft performance have led to numerous general aviation (GA) accidents. This study helps GA pilots better understand the spatial and temporal variability in density altitude, thereby increasing their situational awareness during flight planning. This study also evaluates commonly used approximations to estimate density altitude, so pilots can understand the situations where these approximations are (in)applicable. Results suggest the need for a humidity correction approximation when dewpoint temperatures are <5°C, which is introduced in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it