MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

O12 Hepatic parameters, growth, and sleep with responders and nonresponders to odevixibat treatment: pooled data from the PEDFIC 1 and PEDFIC 2 studies in children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

2022· article· en· W4295254494 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick McKiernan, Ekkehard Sturm, Binita M. Kamath, Richard J. Thompson, Emmanuel Gonzalès, Alain Lachaux, Ulrich Baumann, Eyal Shteyer, Piotr Czubkowski, Reha Artan, Buket Dalgıç, Hasan Özen, Girish Gupte, Tassos Grammatikopoulos, Saul J. Karpen, Quanhong Ni, Lise Kjems, Patrick Horn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCholestasisInternal medicineGastroenterologyBilirubinPlaceboBile acidPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction/Background Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a group of inherited paediatric cholestatic liver diseases. In the phase 3 PEDFIC 1 and PEDFIC 2 studies, odevixibat, an ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor, reduced serum bile acids (sBAs) and improved pruritus in patients with PFIC. Aim Using pooled data from PEDFIC 1 and PEDFIC 2, we analysed hepatic biochemical parameters, growth, and sleep changes in patients who responded to odevixibat (Rs) versus nonresponders (NRs) after up to 72 weeks of treatment. Subjects and Methods PEDFIC 1 was a 24-week, randomised, placebo-controlled study in children with PFIC1 or PFIC2. PEDFIC 2 is an ongoing 72 week, open-label extension study in patients with any type of PFIC. This pooled analysis spans from patients’ first dose of odevixibat to a cut-off date of 4 December 2020. Treatment Rs met either sBA response criteria (defined per the PEDFIC 1 study protocol) or sBA and/or pruritus response criteria (table 1). Assessments included change from baseline in transaminases, total bilirubin, growth, and sleep parameters. Results In total, 84 patients (mean age, 5.0 years) received odevixibat (median [range] exposure, 53 [3−128] weeks). Overall, 30/81 (37%) patients were sBA Rs and 49/84 (58%) were sBA and/or pruritus Rs during weeks 0−72. From baseline to week 72, Rs had mean improvements in transaminases and total bilirubin levels (table 1). Patients who were NRs had more pronounced growth deficits at baseline; however, with treatment, mean height and weight Z scores increased in both Rs and NRs (table 1). Rs and NRs had similar sleep characteristics at baseline. After 72 weeks of treatment, sBA Rs had large decreases in caregiver-reported percentage of days patients had scratching associated with bleeding, needed soothing, and needed help falling asleep (–47%, –76%, –75%, respectively); increases or smaller changes were observed in sBA NRs (3%, –24%, −35%, respectively). Comparable results were observed in sBA and/or pruritus Rs. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 47% and 39% of sBA Rs and NRs, respectively, and in 49% and 31% of sBA and/or pruritus Rs and NRs; no drug-related serious TEAEs were reported. Summary and Conclusion Odevixibat treatment for up to 72 weeks in patients with PFIC was associated with improvement in hepatic health, quality of sleep, and growth, with greater improvement observed in Rs compared with NRs. Odevixibat was generally well tolerated in Rs and NRs. Conflict of Interest Declaration P. McKiernan: Sobi AB, Albireo – Consultant E. Sturm: Albireo, Mirum, and Astellas – Consultant and/or received travel support B.M. Kamath: Albireo, Mirum, and Audentes – Consultant; Albireo and Mirum – Unrestricted educational grant R.J. Thompson: Albireo, Alnylam, Evox Therapeutics, Generation Bio, Mirum Pharma, Rectify Therapeutics, Retrophin, Qing Therapeutics, and Sana Biotechnology – Consultant E. Gonzalès: Laboratoires CTRS, Mirum, and Albireo – Consultant A. Lachaux: GMP-Orphan, CSL Behring – Consultant U. Baumann: Albireo, Mirum, Alnylam, Vivet, and Nestlé – Consultant T. Grammatikopoulos: Albireo – Consultant S.J. Karpen: Albireo, Intercept, LogicBio, and Mirum– Consultant E. Shteyer, P. Czubkowski, R. Artan, B. Dalgic, H. Özen, and G. Gupte: Nothing to disclose Q. Ni, L. Kjems, P. Horn: Albireo – Current or former employment This study was sponsored by Albireo. Medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, and were funded by Albireo Pharma, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.009
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→