MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295276657 · doi:10.1155/2022/8315519

The Effect of Serum β-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Pregnancy Complications and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2022· review· en· W4295276657 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyOdds ratioGestational diabetesObstetricsConfidence intervalMeta-analysisIntrauterine growth restrictionIncidence (geometry)Human chorionic gonadotropinSubgroup analysisGynecologyGestationInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. The relationship among elevated serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), the incidence of pregnancy complications, and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been controversial. Differences in study design, subject bias due to demographic characteristics, and differences in local medical levels could contribute to inconsistent results. Methods. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and China Science Digital Library (CSDL) databases. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) research subjects were singleton pregnant women; (2) the study is identified as cohort study; (3) the subjects were assigned to the high β-hCG group and control group according to whether the exposure factors increased β-hCG in the second trimester; (4) the observed outcomes include at least pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), diabetes (gestational diabetes mellitus, GMD), preterm delivery (PD), and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR); and (5) the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of exposure factors are calculated based on literature dataset. To determine the risk bias of selected literatures, Newcastle-Ottawa scale was applied. The chi-square test was further used for heterogeneity analysis. If heterogeneity was identified, subgroup analyses were then performed for source investigation. Results. A total of 13 literatures were included and analyzed, including 67,355 pregnant women and 5980 pregnant women assigned to the high β-HCG group and 61,375 pregnant women to the control group. The incidence of PIH in the high β-HCG group was higher than that in the control group ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mtext>OR</a:mtext> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>2.11</a:mn> </a:math> , 95% CI [1.90, 2.35], <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mi>Z</c:mi> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>13.85</c:mn> </c:math> , <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mi>P</e:mi> <e:mo>&lt;</e:mo> <e:mn>0.00001</e:mn> </e:math> ). There was no heterogeneity among literatures ( <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <g:msup> <g:mrow> <g:mi>χ</g:mi> </g:mrow> <g:mrow> <g:mn>2</g:mn> </g:mrow> </g:msup> <g:mo>=</g:mo> <g:mn>8.53</g:mn> </g:math> , <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <i:mi>P</i:mi> <i:mo>=</i:mo> <i:mn>0.38</i:mn> </i:math> , <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"> <k:msup> <k:mrow> <k:mi>I</k:mi> </k:mrow> <k:mrow> <k:mn>2</k:mn> </k:mrow> </k:msup> <k:mo>=</k:mo> <k:mn>6</k:mn> <k:mi>%</k:mi> </k:math> ), and thus there is no identified publication bias ( <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7"> <m:mi>P</m:mi> <m:mo>&gt;</m:mo> <m:mn>0.05</m:mn> </m:math> ). The incidence of preterm birth in the high β-HCG group was higher than that in the control group ( <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M8"> <o:mtext>OR</o:mtext> <o:mo>=</o:mo> <o:mn>2.11</o:mn> </o:math> , 95% CI [1.90, 2.35], <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M9"> <q:mi>Z</q:mi> <q:mo>=</q:mo> <q:mn>13.85</q:mn> </q:math> , <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M10"> <s:mi>P</s:mi> <s:mo>&lt;</s:mo> <s:mn>0.00001</s:mn> </s:math> ). The analysis suggested no heterogeneity among included literatures ( <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M11"> <u:msup> <u:mrow> <u:mi>χ</u:mi> </u:mrow> <u:mrow> <u:mn>2</u:mn> </u:mrow> </u:msup> <u:mo>=</u:mo> <u:mn>11.78</u:mn> </u:math> , <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M12"> <w:mi>P</w:mi> <w:mo>=</w:mo> <w:mn>0.11</w:mn> </w:math> , <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M13"> <y:msup> <y:mrow> <y:mi>I</y:mi> </y:mrow> <y:mrow> <y:mn>2</y:mn> </y:mrow> </y:msup> <y:mo>=</y:mo> <y:mn>41</y:mn> <y:mi>%</y:mi> </y:math> ) and no publication bias ( <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M14"> <ab:mi>P</ab:mi> <ab:mo>&gt;</ab:mo> <ab:mn>0.05</ab:mn> </ab:math> ). Higher incidence of abortion was observed in the high β-HCG group compared with the control group ( <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M15"> <cb:mtext>OR</cb:mtext> <cb:mo>=</cb:mo> <cb:mn>2.80</cb:mn> </cb:math> , 95% CI [1.92, 4.09], <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M16"> <eb:mi>Z</eb:mi> <eb:mo>=</eb:mo> <eb:mn>5.32</eb:mn> </eb:math> , <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M17"> <gb:mi>P</gb:mi> <gb:mo>&lt;</gb:mo> <gb:mn>0.00001</gb:mn> </gb:math> ). There was no heterogeneity among literatures ( <ib:math xmlns:ib="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M18"> <ib:msup> <ib:mrow> <ib:mi>χ</ib:mi> </ib:mrow> <ib:mrow> <ib:mn>2</ib:mn> </ib:mrow> </ib:msup> <ib:mo>=</ib:mo> <ib:mn>3.43</ib:mn> </ib:math> , <kb:math xmlns:kb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M19"> <kb:mi>P</kb:mi> <kb:mo>=</kb:mo> <kb:mn>0.33</kb:mn> </kb:math> , <mb:math xmlns:mb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M20"> <mb:msup> <mb:mrow> <mb:mi>I</mb:mi> </mb:mrow> <mb:mrow> <mb:mn>2</mb:mn> </mb:mrow> </mb:msup> <mb:mo>=</mb:mo> <mb:mn>13</mb:mn> <mb:mi>%</mb:mi> </mb:math> ) and no publi

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.185
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it