The Effect of Serum β-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Pregnancy Complications and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. The relationship among elevated serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), the incidence of pregnancy complications, and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been controversial. Differences in study design, subject bias due to demographic characteristics, and differences in local medical levels could contribute to inconsistent results. Methods. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and China Science Digital Library (CSDL) databases. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) research subjects were singleton pregnant women; (2) the study is identified as cohort study; (3) the subjects were assigned to the high β-hCG group and control group according to whether the exposure factors increased β-hCG in the second trimester; (4) the observed outcomes include at least pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), diabetes (gestational diabetes mellitus, GMD), preterm delivery (PD), and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR); and (5) the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of exposure factors are calculated based on literature dataset. To determine the risk bias of selected literatures, Newcastle-Ottawa scale was applied. The chi-square test was further used for heterogeneity analysis. If heterogeneity was identified, subgroup analyses were then performed for source investigation. Results. A total of 13 literatures were included and analyzed, including 67,355 pregnant women and 5980 pregnant women assigned to the high β-HCG group and 61,375 pregnant women to the control group. The incidence of PIH in the high β-HCG group was higher than that in the control group ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mtext>OR</a:mtext> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>2.11</a:mn> </a:math> , 95% CI [1.90, 2.35], <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mi>Z</c:mi> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>13.85</c:mn> </c:math> , <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mi>P</e:mi> <e:mo><</e:mo> <e:mn>0.00001</e:mn> </e:math> ). There was no heterogeneity among literatures ( <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <g:msup> <g:mrow> <g:mi>χ</g:mi> </g:mrow> <g:mrow> <g:mn>2</g:mn> </g:mrow> </g:msup> <g:mo>=</g:mo> <g:mn>8.53</g:mn> </g:math> , <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <i:mi>P</i:mi> <i:mo>=</i:mo> <i:mn>0.38</i:mn> </i:math> , <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"> <k:msup> <k:mrow> <k:mi>I</k:mi> </k:mrow> <k:mrow> <k:mn>2</k:mn> </k:mrow> </k:msup> <k:mo>=</k:mo> <k:mn>6</k:mn> <k:mi>%</k:mi> </k:math> ), and thus there is no identified publication bias ( <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7"> <m:mi>P</m:mi> <m:mo>></m:mo> <m:mn>0.05</m:mn> </m:math> ). The incidence of preterm birth in the high β-HCG group was higher than that in the control group ( <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M8"> <o:mtext>OR</o:mtext> <o:mo>=</o:mo> <o:mn>2.11</o:mn> </o:math> , 95% CI [1.90, 2.35], <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M9"> <q:mi>Z</q:mi> <q:mo>=</q:mo> <q:mn>13.85</q:mn> </q:math> , <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M10"> <s:mi>P</s:mi> <s:mo><</s:mo> <s:mn>0.00001</s:mn> </s:math> ). The analysis suggested no heterogeneity among included literatures ( <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M11"> <u:msup> <u:mrow> <u:mi>χ</u:mi> </u:mrow> <u:mrow> <u:mn>2</u:mn> </u:mrow> </u:msup> <u:mo>=</u:mo> <u:mn>11.78</u:mn> </u:math> , <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M12"> <w:mi>P</w:mi> <w:mo>=</w:mo> <w:mn>0.11</w:mn> </w:math> , <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M13"> <y:msup> <y:mrow> <y:mi>I</y:mi> </y:mrow> <y:mrow> <y:mn>2</y:mn> </y:mrow> </y:msup> <y:mo>=</y:mo> <y:mn>41</y:mn> <y:mi>%</y:mi> </y:math> ) and no publication bias ( <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M14"> <ab:mi>P</ab:mi> <ab:mo>></ab:mo> <ab:mn>0.05</ab:mn> </ab:math> ). Higher incidence of abortion was observed in the high β-HCG group compared with the control group ( <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M15"> <cb:mtext>OR</cb:mtext> <cb:mo>=</cb:mo> <cb:mn>2.80</cb:mn> </cb:math> , 95% CI [1.92, 4.09], <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M16"> <eb:mi>Z</eb:mi> <eb:mo>=</eb:mo> <eb:mn>5.32</eb:mn> </eb:math> , <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M17"> <gb:mi>P</gb:mi> <gb:mo><</gb:mo> <gb:mn>0.00001</gb:mn> </gb:math> ). There was no heterogeneity among literatures ( <ib:math xmlns:ib="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M18"> <ib:msup> <ib:mrow> <ib:mi>χ</ib:mi> </ib:mrow> <ib:mrow> <ib:mn>2</ib:mn> </ib:mrow> </ib:msup> <ib:mo>=</ib:mo> <ib:mn>3.43</ib:mn> </ib:math> , <kb:math xmlns:kb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M19"> <kb:mi>P</kb:mi> <kb:mo>=</kb:mo> <kb:mn>0.33</kb:mn> </kb:math> , <mb:math xmlns:mb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M20"> <mb:msup> <mb:mrow> <mb:mi>I</mb:mi> </mb:mrow> <mb:mrow> <mb:mn>2</mb:mn> </mb:mrow> </mb:msup> <mb:mo>=</mb:mo> <mb:mn>13</mb:mn> <mb:mi>%</mb:mi> </mb:math> ) and no publi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it