Can tandem alternative splicing and evasion of premature termination codon surveillance contribute to attenuated <scp>Peutz–Jeghers</scp> syndrome?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AG are a common mechanism of alternative splicing; however, single nucleotide variants are rarely reported as likely to generate or to disrupt tandem splice sites. We identify a pathogenic intron 5 STK11 variant (NM_000455.4:c.[735-6A>G];[=]) segregating with the mucocutaneous features but not the hamartomatous polyps of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome in two individuals. By RNAseq analysis of peripheral blood mRNA, this variant was shown to generate a novel and preferentially used tandem proximal splice acceptor (AAGTGAAG). The variant transcript (NM_000455.4:c.734_734 + 1insTGAAG), which encodes a frameshift (p.[Tyr246Glufs*43]) constituted 36%-43% of STK11 transcripts suggesting partial escape from nonsense mediated mRNA decay and translation of a truncated protein. A review of the ClinVar database identified other similar variants. We suggest that nucleotide changes creating or disrupting tandem alternative splice sites are a pertinent disease mechanism and require contextualization for clinical reporting. Additionally, we hypothesize that some pathogenic STK11 variants cause an attenuated phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".