MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295630306 · doi:10.1007/s11160-022-09729-4

Correction: Reading the biomineralized book of life: expanding otolith biogeochemical research and applications for fisheries and ecosystem-based management

2022· article· en· W4295630306 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick Reis‐Santos, Bronwyn M. Gillanders, Anna M. Sturrock, Christopher Izzo, Dion S. Oxman, Jessica A. Lueders‐Dumont, Karin Hüssy, Susanne E. Tanner, Troy A. Rogers, Zoë A. Doubleday, Allen H. Andrews, Clive N. Trueman, Deirdre Brophy, Jason D. Thiem, Lee J. Baumgartner, Malte Willmes, Ming‐Tsung Chung, Patrick Charapata, Rachel C. Johnson, Stephen J. Trumble, Yvette Heimbrand, Karin E. Limburg, Benjamin D. Walther

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOtolithBiologyBiogeochemical cycleFisheryFisheries managementReading (process)EcosystemOceanographyMarine ecosystemFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyFishingLinguisticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.070
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.070
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in Fish Biology and FisheriesSame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207