Correction: Reading the biomineralized book of life: expanding otolith biogeochemical research and applications for fisheries and ecosystem-based management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There was an oversight in the authorship at the time of publication and the article is corrected to include Patrick Charapata and Stephen Trumble from the Biology Department, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA. The correct full authorship is given below: Patrick Reis-Santos; Bronwyn M. Gillanders; Anna M. Sturrock; Christopher Izzo; Dion S. Oxman; Jessica A. Lueders-Dumont Karin Hüssy; Susanne E. Tanner; Troy Rogers; Zoë A. Doubleday; Allen H. Andrews; Clive Trueman; Deirdre Brophy; Jason D. Thiem; Lee J. Baumgartner; Malte Willmes; Ming-Tsung Chung; Patrick Charapata, Rachel C. Johnson; Stephen Trumble, Yvette Heimbrand; Karin E. Limburg; Benjamin D. Walther. Author contributions are corrected accordingly to read: “…DSO and AMS drafted the section on maturity and reproduction, with contributions from PC and ST…”. The end of the caption of Figure 3 should read: “(Charapata, Oxman, and Trumble, unpublished)”. In the manuscript and reference list, Charapata et al 2020 should read, respectively, “Charapata et al (2022)”, and “Charapata P, Oxman D, McNeel K, Keith A, Mansouri F, Trumble S (2022) Lifetime hormone profiles for a long-lived teleost: Opercula reveal novel estimates of age-specific reproductive parameters and stress trends in yelloweye rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. ”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.070 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".