MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295678883 · doi:10.1063/5.0111636

Strong-field molecular ionization beyond the single active electron approximation

2022· article· en· W4295678883 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean-Nicolas Vigneau, T. T. Nguyen‐Dang, Éric Charron, O. Atabek

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute Canada
KeywordsIonizationAttosecondAtomic physicsExcited stateElectronTunnel ionizationPolarizabilityPhysicsDouble ionizationChemistryMoleculeLaserIonQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work explores quantitative limits to the single-active electron approximation, often used to deal with strong-field ionization and subsequent attosecond dynamics. Using a time-dependent, multiconfiguration approach, specifically the time-dependent configuration interaction method, we solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for the two-electron dihydrogen molecule with the possibility of tuning at will the electron–electron interaction by an adiabatic switch-on/switch-off function. We focus on signals of the single ionization of H2 under a strong near-infrared, four-cycle, linearly polarized laser pulse of varying intensity and within a vibrationally frozen molecular model. The observables we address are post-pulse total ionization probability profiles as a function of the laser peak intensity. Three values of the internuclear distance R taken as a parameter are considered, R = Req = 1.4 a.u. for the equilibrium geometry of the molecule, R = 5.0 a.u. for an elongated molecule, and R = 10.2 a.u. for a dissociating molecule. The most striking observation is the non-monotonous behavior of the ionization probability profiles at intermediate elongation distances with an instance of enhanced ionization and one of partial ionization quenching. We give an interpretation of this in terms of a resonance-enhanced-multiphoton ionization mechanism with interfering overlapping resonances resulting from excited electronic states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207