Long-term vascular dysfunction in Kawasaki disease: systematic review and meta-analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term physiological dysfunction in coronary/systemic vasculature may persist in individuals with Kawasaki disease even in the absence of coronary artery abnormalities. We perform a systematic review and meta-analyses of studies assessing long-term vascular function in Kawasaki disease. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant literature published till May 2021. Patients with Kawasaki disease were included as cases and healthy age/sex-matched individuals as controls. Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess the study quality. Outcome measures were differences in markers of vascular function 1 year after diagnosis of Kawasaki disease. Data were analysed using Review Manager software. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used for meta-regression. To assess the certainty of evidence, GRADE Profiler software was utilised. RESULTS: Of 2280 citations, 49 case-control studies (comprising 2714 cases and 2118 controls) were included for data synthesis. Decreased flow-mediated dilatation [3.83, 95%CI 0.94-6.72] and increased pulse-wave velocity [39.34 cm/sec, 95%CI 20.86-57.83], arterial stiffness [0.35, 95%CI 0.11-0.59], and common carotid artery intima-media thickness were noted in patients with Kawasaki disease. No significant difference was observed for nitroglycerine-mediated dilatation and endothelial peripheral artery tonometry (endo-PAT). Significant inter-study heterogeneity was observed for flow-mediated dilatation, arterial stiffness, carotid artery intima-media thickness, and endo-PAT. The GRADE evidence was of 'very low quality' for all outcome measures except 'moderate quality' for pulse-wave velocity. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests the presence of long-term endothelial dysfunction in patients with Kawasaki disease even in the absence of coronary artery abnormalities. Avoidance of development of other cardiovascular risk factors seems prudent in patients with Kawasaki disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".