MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295780359 · doi:10.1021/acscatal.2c01852

Kinetic Coupling of Redox and Acid Chemistry in Methanol Partial Oxidation on Vanadium Oxide Catalysts

2022· article· en· W4295780359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Catalysis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysis and Oxidation Reactions
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSuncor Energy Incorporated
KeywordsDehydrogenationChemistryCatalysisCatalytic cycleDimethoxymethaneMethanolInorganic chemistryPhotochemistryVanadiumBond cleavageLewis acids and basesVanadium oxidePartial oxidationRedoxMethyl formateFormaldehydeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kinetic, isotopic, and spectroscopic studies establish the active site requirements for three kinetically coupled catalytic cycles catalyzed by redox, Brønsted, and Lewis acid–base sites, which occur during methanol and oxygen reactions on titania-supported vanadium oxide catalysts. The initial activation of methanol during its oxidative dehydrogenation to formaldehyde restricts the overall turnovers─this reaction proceeds via CH3OH dissociative adsorption followed by a kinetically relevant C–H bond scission of the CH3O intermediate on V–O redox site pairs found at the interface of VOx and TiO2. The Gibbs free energy change of these two steps (ΔGads and ΔG⧧, respectively) both decrease as V–O–V coordination decreases and V–O–Ti coordination increases, leading to higher turnovers per surface vanadium as VOx dispersion increases, except the extreme case of isolated VO4. Coupled kinetically with the oxidative dehydrogenation cycle is the Brønsted acid-catalyzed cycle that forms dimethoxymethane─this cycle proceeds via methanol- and formaldehyde-derived CH3OCH2OH adsorption to Brønsted sites at the VOx–TiO2 interface, followed by its kinetically relevant C–O bond scission. Its turnovers also increase with VOx dispersion following the same trend as the oxidative dehydrogenation cycle but at a much faster rate, so the reaction can readily approach chemical equilibrium. Alongside the other two catalytic cycles is the Tishchenko reaction that forms methyl formate from two formaldehyde molecules, produced by the methanol oxidative dehydrogenation cycle, on exposed Ti4+–O2– Lewis acid–base pairs uncovered by VOx─this cycle proceeds via kinetically relevant intermolecular C–O bond formation followed by a rapid 1,3-hydride shift. The interplay of coexisting redox, Brønsted, and Lewis sites, each with its unique catalytic roles, leads to different rates and yields of the three products. The active site structure and mechanistic knowledge established here allow us to optimize the product ratios required for downstream synthesis of larger oxygenates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it