Early Cretaceous to Cenozoic Growth of the Patagonian Andes as Revealed by Low‐Temperature Thermochronology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Southern Patagonian Andes at the latitude of the Chile Triple junction in Argentina and Chile (46°–47.5°S) are the object of an ongoing discussion regarding their orogenic evolution in terms of tectonic crustal thickening and exhumation. Recent works point to an Early Cretaceous onset of shortening according to observations in foreland sequences. The ensuing Cenozoic thermal history of the region was influenced by increased shortening, oceanic‐ridge collision and formation of asthenospheric windows in a dynamic subduction setting. Furthermore, the onset of Patagonian glaciations after 7 Ma added increased complexities to the analysis of the main drivers of crustal cooling in this region. We applied zircon (U‐Th)/He and apatite fission track thermochronometry, and inverse thermal modeling to unravel the thermal history throughout different structural domains of the Patagonian Andes. New thermochronological data and thermal models showed a previously unrecognized set of Cretaceous cooling ages (120‐80 Ma) toward the foreland, that we relate to the onset of contraction during initial tectonic inversion. Toward the hinterland, Cenozoic cooling ages predominate, and are related to Oligocene‐Miocene contraction in response to increased subduction velocities. Based on the regional distribution of thermochronological ages and on results from thermal modeling, a resetting of the zircon (U‐Th)/He and apatite fission track systems in response to crustal heating related to the formation of an asthenospheric window after 16 Ma appears unlikely. After 7 Ma cooling rates increased in response to enhanced glacial erosion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".