MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295788309 · doi:10.1029/2021jc018120

Synoptic <sup>129</sup>I and CFC–SF<sub>6</sub> Transit Time Distribution (TTD) Sections Across the Central Arctic Ocean From the 2015 GEOTRACES Cruises

2022· article· en· W4295788309 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. N. Smith, William M. Smethie, Núria Casacuberta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of Oceanography
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotracesAdvectionTrough (economics)GeologyOutflowRidgeTRACERArcticTransit timeStructural basinSaturation (graph theory)OceanographyEnvironmental scienceGeomorphologySeawaterPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Measurements of the tracers, 129I, CFC‐11, and SF6 on water samples collected in the Arctic Ocean in 2015 have been used to calculate mean ages, Γ and mixing, Δ parameters using transit time distributions (TTDs) to constrain water circulation and mixing time scales. Values of Γ and Δ determined separately using the two tracer pairs, SF6‐CFC‐11, and 129I‐CFC‐11 are in good agreement for gas solubilities estimated for saturation levels of 0.90, but agreement decreases for other gas saturation levels. Both Γ and Δ increase rapidly with increasing depth below the base of the intermediate water layer (ca. 1,000 m), but maintaining a value of Δ/Γ ≅ 1 supporting the use of this proportionality in applications of TTDs to deep ocean transport of substances such as anthropogenic carbon. Isolines of Γ = 20 years deepening to depths below 1,000 m over the flank of the Mendeleyev Ridge near the North Pole outline the bathymetrically steered, return flow of recently ventilated Atlantic Water toward Fram Strait. Basin interior waters are significantly older with the Γ = 25 years mean age isoline shallowing upward to depths above 500 m in the Makarov, Canada, and Eurasian Basins. Values of Δ remain relatively constant in the 6–10 years range in upper intermediate water across all three basins indicating that flow is principally advective and that the mixing specified by Δ likely occurs upstream of the central basins in regions proximal to the outflow from the Santa Anna Trough.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research OceansSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207