MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295792714 · doi:10.54991/jop.2012.353

Stromatolites of the Kaladgi Basin, Karnataka, India: Systematics, biostratigraphy and age implications

2012· article· en· W4295792714 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Мукунд Шарма

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Palaeosciences · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProterozoicStromatoliteSupergroupPaleontologyGeologySystematicsBiostratigraphyPrecambrianSequence (biology)Group (periodic table)Taxonomy (biology)CarbonateBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Systematics of the stromatolites of the Proterozoic Kaladgi Basin is attempted. The main purpose is to document the diversity and distribution of the various stromatolite forms occurring in the Bagalkot Group of the Kaladgi Supergroup. An assemblage of six taxa is recognized from the Bagalkot Group. The forms Asperia digitata (=Yelma digitata), Ephyaltes edingunnensis, Eucapsiphora leakensis, Kussoidella karalundiensis, Pilbaria deverella and Yandilla meekatharrensis are described. These forms are not recorded from any other Proterozoic Sequence of India of the Palaeoproterozoic age. Similar forms are recorded from Africa, Australia, Canada and China. Asperia digitata, a digitate stromatolite, is known from the Proterozoic Sequence of the Palaeoproterozoic age in other parts of the world. Poorly constrained age of the Bagalkot Group of the Kaladgi Supergroup can be ascertained on the basis of the reported assemblage as Late Palaeoproterozoic to Early Mesoproterozoic (Orosirian-Statherian to Calymmian Period).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PalaeosciencesSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207