MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295863904 · doi:10.1161/hyp.79.suppl_1.127

Abstract 127: Nox5 Expression In A Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell-specific Manner Induces Fibroblast To Myofibroblast Differentiation

2022· article· en· W4295863904 on OpenAlexaff
Augusto C. Montezano, Francisco J. Rios, Zachariel Blaikie, Tomador E Saad, Lívia L. Camargo, Wendy Beattie, Frédéric Jaisser, Tomasz J. Guzik, Delyth Graham, Rhian M. Touyz

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyofibroblastFibroblastFibrosisCD68InflammationVascular smooth muscleChemistryEndocrinologyMolecular biologyInternal medicineMedicineBiologyImmunohistochemistrySmooth muscleIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mice expressing human Nox5 (hNox5) in VSMC exhibit cardfiovascular fibrosis, where mechanisms are unknown. We postulated that VSMC-Nox5 promotes fibroblast to myofibroblast differentiation that contributes to fibrosis. Fibroblasts were cultured from wildtype (WT) and hNOX5 mice. Mice (20 weeks old) were infused with Ang II (600 ng/Kg/day) for 28 days and renal fibrosis/inflammation studied. Markers of myofibroblasts (αSMA), and pro-fibrotic and inflammatory signaling molecules were assessed by qPCR and immunoblotting. Inflammatory infiltrate was assessed by FACS. Fibroblasts from Nox5 mice exhibited increased mRNA of markers of myofibroblast αSMA (2 -ddC :1.54±0.05 vs. WT 0.78±0.17) and Myocd (2 -ddC :1.36±0.17 vs. WT 0.39±0.22), as well as, pro-fibrotic markers, Col1A1 (2 -ddC :1.74±0.16 vs. WT 0.67±0.11), Col3A1 (2 -ddC :1.74±0.18 vs. WT 0.96±0.24) and TIMP3 (2 -ddC :2.65±0.25 vs. WT 0.38±0.07), p<0.05. mRNA expression of CD36 (2 -ddC :1.37±0.07 vs. WT 86±0.24), TNFα (2 -ddC :1.32±0.2 vs. WT 0.71±0.17) and TNFR1 (2 -ddC :1.26±0.04 vs. WT 1.02±0.10) were increased, while CD68 expression was decreased (2 -ddC :0.82±0.11 vs. WT 1.36±0.18) in fibroblasts from Nox5 mice (p<0.05). In Nox5 mice fibroblasts, ROS production and TGFβ protein expression (AU:1.8±0.05 vs. WT 1.4±0.06), as well as TGFβR2 gene expression (2 -ddC :2.04±0.17 vs. WT 0.57±0.12), were increased (p<0.05). mRNA of DNMT3a and TET2, DNA methylation regulatory enzymes, were also increased in fibroblasts from Nox5 mice, p<0.05. Kidneys from Ang II-infused Nox5 mice exhibited significant perivascular fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration compared to WT, as well as increased protein expression of TGFβ (AU: 3.59±0.8 vs. WT 1.54±0.2) and IL-11 (AU: 0.64±0.08 vs. WT 0.39±0.04), p<0.05; where levels of macrophage F4/80+ cells (%:24±2 vs WT 18±1, p<0.05) and levels of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells were increased, p<0.05. Kidney expression of vimentin (AU:1.01±0.05 vs WT 0.85±0.03) and αSMA (AU:0.44±0.03 vs WT 0.33±0.01), were increased in Nox5 mice (p<0.05). Nox5 regulates fibrosis by inducing fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation, possibly through increased ROS. These processes may be important in Nox5-assocated cardiovascular-renal fibrosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207