MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295926423 · doi:10.1061/9780784484401.017

Keeping the Vision: A Small Port’s Journey to Comprehensive Remediation of a Wood Treating Site

2022· article· en· W4295926423 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua C. Elliott, Laurie Olin

Bibliographic record

VenuePorts 2022 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsEagle Ridge Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental remediationPort (circuit theory)Computer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringContamination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The former Pacific Wood Treating’s (PWT’s) wood-treating operations heavily impacted the Lake River Industrial Site (LRIS) that is owned by the Port of Ridgefield (the Port) and is located along the lower Columbia River in the city of Ridgefield, Washington. Site impacts included extensive dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) contamination in soil and groundwater as well as ubiquitous metals, tetrachloroethene, pentachlorophenol (PCP), and dioxin contamination in soil. Dioxin contamination extended off of the site conveyed by stormwater into surface waterbodies and wetlands and into an adjacent residential neighborhood by truck tracking and aerial deposition. By partnering with the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), the Port was able to make use of state grant funding, avoid the National Priorities List, and begin their vision of turning the site into a community asset. The Port performed a comprehensive investigation and remediation of the site over two decades to both address risk to human health and the environment and to return the Port’s property to productive use. The Port implemented remediation primarily as a sequence of strategic emergency and interim actions that were intended to function together as a final remedy. Remediation technologies employed on Port-owned property included steam-enhanced remediation of DNAPL in deep groundwater, excavation and off-site disposal of soil and shallow DNAPL impacts, installation of a clean soil cap across the site, and replacement of the aged storm sewer network. Dioxin-contaminated sediment in Lake River, a tidal backwater of the Columbia River, was removed using the precision-dredging method. Dioxin contamination in Carty Lake, a priority wetland habitat in the Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge (RNWR), was removed by excavation “in the dry”; habitat within the lake was successfully restored and enhanced. The Port also led remediation of 29 residential properties and additional public rights-of-way with shallow dioxin contamination in soil. Accessible contaminated soil was excavated and disposed of off site; landscaping elements were carefully restored with minimal disruption to homeowners. This case study will follow the project, that included active remediation of nearly all environmental media, to understand how this small port district leveraged a variety of creative funding opportunities and advanced remedial technologies to lead and complete a major site cleanup. Work at the LRIS is now complete, and off-site work is nearly complete. The project opened Ridgefield’s only waterfront, closed by industry for over 100 years, to thriving public use—including dedicating a large swath of the waterfront as a public greenway. In cooperation with the Port, the RNWR has since made this greenway the locus of a new trail network across the refuge. The Port’s property is now ready for redevelopment as the focal point of a community that has consistently ranked as the fastest growing in Washington State.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0060.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePorts 2022Same topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207