MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract PR009: A new invasive zebrafish model of ewing sarcoma reveals EWSR1-FLI1-driven dysregulation of heparan sulfate proteoglycan metabolism and ERK signaling in developing tumors

2022· article· en· W4295926608 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elena Vasileva, Mikako Warren, Timothy J. Triche, James F. Amatrud

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZebrafishBiologyTumor microenvironmentSarcomaCancer researchFLI1AngiogenesisMetastasisOncogeneCancerExtracellular matrixTumor progressionPathologyCell biologyMedicineGeneticsCell cycleGeneTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ewing sarcoma is a malignant tumor of bones or soft tissues with an extremely poor prognosis for patients with metastatic or relapsed disease. Ewing sarcoma is associated with the appearance of a chimeric fusion oncogene, most frequently EWSR1-FLI1 (EF1). The interaction of Ewing sarcoma cells with the tumor microenvironment is essential for tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. The tumor microenvironment includes surrounding blood vessels, immune cells, signaling molecules, and extracellular matrix. The dependence of a tumor cell on its microenvironment opens new possibilities to target not just cancer cells but also the tumor microenvironment itself. In the absence of a representative in vivo model, the role of tumor cell/microenvironmental interactions in Ewing sarcoma initiation and progression is not well-understood. To address these concerns, we developed a new in vivo genetic model of Ewing sarcoma by integrating the human EWSR1-FLI1 fusion oncogene into the zebrafish genome. Our system allows broad mosaic Cre-inducible expression of human EF1 in zebrafish, which causes rapid onset of Ewing sarcoma at high penetrance. This invasive model allows studying the behavior of GFP-labeled cancer cells during tumor initiation and progression, in a complex developmental context which is not currently possible in mammals. We found that observed tumors express canonical EF1 target genes and stain for known Ewing sarcoma markers including CD99. Proteomic analysis revealed that EF1 expression affects the expression of enzymes involved in heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) metabolism. Such dysregulation of proteoglycan metabolism is associated with activation of ERK1/2 signaling pathway in tumor cells resulting in increased tumor cell proliferation and survival. Proteoglycans are key regulators of signaling of cell surface receptors, playing an essential role in cell-to-cell communication. Targeting heparan sulfate proteoglycans with the specific heparan sulfate antagonist Surfen reduces ERK1/2 signaling and decreases tumorigenicity of Ewing sarcoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, our new zebrafish model will open new possibilities to study EWSR1-FLI- driven tumorigenesis, as well as mechanisms of tumor development and progression. Our results highlight the important role of the extracellular matrix in Ewing sarcoma tumor growth and the potential of agents targeting proteoglycan metabolism as novel therapies for this disease. Citation Format: Elena Vasileva, Mikako Warren, Timothy J. Triche, James F. Amatrud. A new invasive zebrafish model of ewing sarcoma reveals EWSR1-FLI1-driven dysregulation of heparan sulfate proteoglycan metabolism and ERK signaling in developing tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PR009.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.260
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→