MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A036: Surfaceome profiling of rhabdomyosarcoma reveals B7-H3 as a mediator of immune evasion

2022· article· en· W4295942202 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roxane R. Lavoie, Fabrice Lucien, Patricio C. Gargollo, Mohamed E. Ahmed, Yohan Kim, Emily Baer, Doris A. Phelps, Cristine Charlesworth, Benjamin Madden, Liguo Wang, Peter J. Hougthon, John C. Cheville, Haidong Dong, Candace F. Granberg

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhabdomyosarcomaImmune systemCancer researchFusion proteinBiologyTranscriptomeCellMedicineImmunologyPathologyGene expressionGeneSarcoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue tumor in children, with nearly 20% of children presenting with locally aggressive and/or metastatic disease. Despite aggressive chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the 5-year overall survival rate is still less than 40%. In addition, resistance to chemotherapy remains the major cause of cancer-related mortality. Therefore, there is an unmet need to develop more effective and tolerable therapeutic strategies for the treatment of RMS. Our overall objective is to leverage transcriptomic and proteomic profiling methods to identify RMS-specific surface proteins targetable with immune-based therapies. Methods: To identify therapeutic targets, we performed cell-surface capture and mass spectrometry on fusion-positive (FP), fusion-negative (FN) RMS and normal skeletal muscle. Transcriptomic datasets of RMS tumor specimens and normal tissue were employed to identify high-confidence RMS-specific cell-surface proteins. Expression of immune checkpoint molecules was confirmed by flow cytometry, western blot and PCR. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were used to determine protein expression and prognostic value in RMS patients. We developed an in vitro T-cell killing assay to assess the functional role of immune checkpoint molecules on the antitumor immune response. Results: Surfaceome profiling of RMS cells revealed unique protein signatures specific for each tumor type and normal tissue. We have identified 5061 cell-surface proteins in RMS and 31.6% of proteins were correctly located at the plasma membrane. By integrating proteomic and transcriptomic data, we have identified 30 and 38 proteins significantly overexpressed in fusion-negative and fusion-positive RMS respectively compared to normal muscle. We have identified the immune checkpoint molecule B7-H3 as cell-surface protein overexpressed in both RMS subtypes. Strong expression of B7-H3 was also observed in patient’s tumor specimens. Genetic deletion of B7-H3 gene in RMS cells was associated with higher antitumor immune response in tumor cells co-cultured with CD8+-T cells. No difference was observed in tumor cell proliferation and radioresistance. Conclusions: Through integrated transcriptomic and proteomic profiling, we have discovered B7-H3 as a key regulator of tumor immune-evasion in RMS. B7-H3 is a suitable immunotherapy target for the treatment of RMS. Further studies are warranted to elucidate underlying mechanisms of B7-H3 function in RMS. Citation Format: Roxane R. Lavoie, Fabrice Lucien, Patricio C. Gargollo, Mohamed E. Ahmed, Yohan Kim, Emily Baer, Doris Phelps, Cristine M. Charlesworth, Benjamin J. Madden, Liguo Wang, Peter J. Hougthon, John Cheville, Haidong Dong, Candace F. Granberg. Surfaceome profiling of rhabdomyosarcoma reveals B7-H3 as a mediator of immune evasion [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr A036.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.252
GPT teacher head0.537
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→