The western redcedar genome reveals low genetic diversity in a self-compatible conifer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
), an ecologically and economically important conifer species of the Cupressaceae. The genome assembly, derived from a uniquely inbred tree produced through five generations of self-fertilization (selfing), was determined to be 86% complete by BUSCO analysis, one of the most complete genome assemblies for a conifer. Population genomic analysis revealed WRC to be one of the most genetically depauperate wild plant species, with an effective population size of approximately 300 and no significant genetic differentiation across its geographic range. Nucleotide diversity, π, is low for a continuous tree species, with many loci showing zero diversity, and the ratio of π at zero- to fourfold degenerate sites is relatively high (approximately 0.33), suggestive of weak purifying selection. Using an array of genetic lines derived from up to five generations of selfing, we explored the relationship between genetic diversity and mating system. Although overall heterozygosity was found to decline faster than expected during selfing, heterozygosity persisted at many loci, and nearly 100 loci were found to deviate from expectations of genetic drift, suggestive of associative overdominance. Nonreference alleles at such loci often harbor deleterious mutations and are rare in natural populations, implying that balanced polymorphisms are maintained by linkage to dominant beneficial alleles. This may account for how WRC remains responsive to natural and artificial selection, despite low genetic diversity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".