MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296002653 · doi:10.35814/asiimetrik.v4i1.3127

Analisis Serangan Vulnerabilities Terhadap Server Selama Work from Home saat Pandemi Covid-19 sebagai Prosedur Mitigasi

2022· article· en· W4296002653 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kotim Subandi, Victor Ilyas Sugara

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal ASIIMETRIK Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa & Inovasi · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Social Justice Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementCisco Systems
KeywordsComputer securityHackerThe InternetServerGovernment (linguistics)BusinessContext (archaeology)Network securitySecurity awarenessFirewall (physics)Information securityComputer scienceWorld Wide WebFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the COVID-19 Pandemic occurred, companies engaged in the retail sector have experienced a decline in the impact of government regulations such as PSBB (Large-Scale Social Restrictions) so that all activities were carried out from home or Work from Home (WFH). to assist companies or agencies with various types of information systems in carrying out their business activities and operations This server is one of the most important in the retail company. The opening of several accesses from the public network (internet) to the local area network (LAN) The security of a LAN network that is accessed from a public network is usually an administrator's problem. Often, the security problems of both the network and the entire application system, as well as the web server, are neglected just to ensure that operational activities run smoothly, and security is only realised after a disaster occurs. Without a good network security and application system, the application of any sophisticated technology will be very dangerous for the company, institution, or organisation itself. So, it takes a security analysis of all activities on the LAN, servers, and other devices to prevent mitigation and to be more aware of server security vulnerabilities. Based on the context of the existing issues, a penetration testing analysis is required. As supporting material, this research also uses guidelines from the CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) module and the official Acunetix website. The test of this research is aimed at finding the weaknesses of the existing company/institution servers. Among others, quite a lot of weaknesses were found, where each of these weaknesses has a different handling, ports that should be blocked but are opened freely, and access to public IPs that are less important should be closed. The solutions proposed to overcome these problems include: the use of this Acunetix standard can be maintained and continued; testing is much better if carried out more than two times; periodically upgrading SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) vulnerable; increasing the level of server security; migration of quality antivirus; and upgrade of expired operating systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal ASIIMETRIK Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa & InovasiSame topicLegal and Social Justice StudiesFrench-language works237,207