Recurrent triamcinolone injections for the treatment of Hunner’s lesions in bladder pain syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To determine if periodic triamcinolone injections into Hunner’s lesion in patients with bladder pain syndrome (BPS) reduces the need for opioids and other pain treatments. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 28 patients receiving endoscopic injections of 0.5–1.0 cc of triamcinolone acetate into Hunner’s lesions between 2010 and 2018. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pain regimens before and after injections. Results: Median age at first triamcinolone injection was 63 (IQR 54–73). Median number of injections/patient was 3 (IQR 2–5.5), at a mean of 8-month intervals (2–80). The median number of pain treatments prior to triamcinolone was 4 (0–13), and 25% of patients were using opioids. With one or more injections, 92.9% had improvement in pain symptoms. There was a significant decrease in number of pain treatments following triamcinolone injections (4.1 vs 0.8, p = 0.006). Fifty-seven percent managed with triamcinolone injections alone, with no other pain treatments. Of the seven patients using opioids, four discontinued opioids altogether. Conclusions: Repeat triamcinolone injections into Hunner’s lesions are associated with a significant reduction in the number of pain treatments used for BPS, with an associated decrease in opioid use. Level of evidence: 4
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".