MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296058845 · doi:10.16993/rnef.77

L’imaginaire du Nord est-il genré ? Regard statistique, lieux communs, figures et représentations

2022· article· fr· W4296058845 on OpenAlexaffabout
Daniel Chartier

Bibliographic record

VenueNordic Journal of Francophone Studies/Revue nordique des études francophones · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryHumanitiesHEROEthnologyTypologyRepresentation (politics)ArtSketchSociologyArt historyAnthropologyLiteraturePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the author asks the question: “Is the imagined North gendered?”. From a statistical analysis of the proportion of women among writers in Northern cultures (understood here as a circumpolar whole, and not strictly European) and from a statistical sketch from a body of works that form the imagined North, then taking into account recent studies, in particular those of Heidi Hansson, Amélie Nadeau and Renée Hulan who study the relationship to the northern territory from the women’s perspective, as well as some of the components of the imaginary of the North, he proposes a typology of the stereotypical figures of women in the works of this imaginary, while examining reversal movements, especially contemporary ones. He concludes that the North, despite some advances in our time, is governed by the rules of a system of representation oriented towards the enhancement of the male hero, a perspective that must therefore be taken into account in the analysis of the works that form the images of the North and Arctic. Résumé Dans cet article, l’auteur pose la question : « L’imaginaire du Nord est-il genré ? » À partir d’une analyse statistique de la proportion des femmes parmi les écrivains des cultures nordiques (comprises ici comme un tout circumpolaire, et non strictement européen) et d’une esquisse statistique à partir d’un corpus d’œuvres qui forment l’imaginaire du Nord, puis en prenant en compte les études récentes, notamment celles de Heidi Hansson, d’Amélie Nadeau et de Renée Hulan qui étudient le rapport au territoire nordique dans la perspective féminine, ainsi que certaines des composantes de l’imaginaire du Nord, il propose une typologie des figures stéréotypées de la femme dans les œuvres de cet imaginaire, tout en examinant des mouvements de renversement, surtout contemporains. Il conclut que le Nord, malgré quelques avancées de notre époque est régi selon les règles d’un système de représentation tourné vers la valorisation du héros masculin, une perspective qui doit donc être pris en compte dans l’analyse des œuvres qui forment l’imaginaire du Nord et de l’Arctique. Mots-clefs : Imaginaire du Nord; genre sexué; littérature; pays nordiques; Québec; France

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.014
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNordic Journal of Francophone Studies/Revue nordique des études francophonesSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207