MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296082375 · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/ac92af

A fast sparse least squares support vector machine hysteresis model for piezoelectric actuator

2022· article· en· W4296082375 on OpenAlexaff
Xuefei Mao, Haocheng Du, Siwei Sun, Xiangdong Liu, Jinjun Shan, Ying Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Materials and Structures · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Beijing MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHysteresisLeast squares support vector machineControl theory (sociology)ActuatorLeast-squares function approximationCompensation (psychology)Process (computing)Tracking (education)Support vector machineComputer scienceController (irrigation)PiezoelectricityAlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The inherent nonlinearities of piezoelectric actuator (PEA), especially hysteresis, greatly reduce the tracking performance of PEA. With a lot of computing resources consumed in the predicting process, the hysteresis modeling method of PEA based on the least-squares support vector machine (LSSVM) cannot be used for hysteresis compensation at high frequency. To solve this problem, a sequential selection approximate algorithm is proposed to obtain a fast sparse LSSVM (SLSSVM) hysteresis model. The SLSSVM model’s support vectors are only 6.8% of the original LSSVM model, by which the modeling speed and calculation speed are greatly improved. The experimental results show that the SLSSVM model improves the tracking accuracy when used in hybrid control system, especially for high frequency trajectories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmart Materials and StructuresSame topicPiezoelectric Actuators and ControlFrench-language works237,207