Formation of Individual-Author Identity in the Process of Training Future Teachers of Music
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current article is an attempt to reveal the theoretical and practical foundations of the formation of individual-author identity of future teachers of music. In addition, to explore the basic vectors and factors of the concept of “I” in the paradigm of Self-Identity + Musician & Creativity Identity. The development and realization of experimental model of training of students for the purpose of individual-authorial identity formation became a tool of the aim realization. Research methods: formative experiment, online questionnaire using Google Forms, self-reflection survey with combined type questions and essays, statistical generalizations and complex data analysis, generalizations. Individual-authorial identity is interpreted within the experimental model of training as a set of complex connections between the individual “I” of the student and music as an art. In addition to important qualitative data obtained during the final stage of the experiment, it was also found that the average level of academic success in the experimental group was 17.8%–21.6% higher than the level of the parallel group, which worked on the usual educational model. 35.2% of respondents successfully work as a music teacher in educational institutions of different levels (against the average of 8.5-20.9%). Individual-author identity affects the effectiveness of learning and contributes to the formation of professional orientation. It focuses on a creative approach to teaching music and conscious development of creative abilities. The following research should focus on further testing of the proposed training model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it