Integrated genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis reveals MDH2 mutation-induced metabolic disorder in recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) has an over 30% risk of recurrence after kidney transplantation (Ktx) and is associated with an extremely high risk of graft loss. However, mechanisms remain largely unclear. Thus, this study identifies novel genes related to the recurrence of FSGS (rFSGS). Whole genome-wide sequencing and next-generation RNA sequencing were used to identify the candidate mutant genes associated with rFSGS in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with biopsy-confirmed rFSGS after KTx. To confirm the functional role of the identified gene with the MDH2 c.26C >T mutation, a homozygous MDH2 c.26C >T mutation in HMy2.CIR cell line was induced by CRISPR/Cas9 and co-cultured with podocytes, mesangial cells, or HK2 cells, respectively, to detect the potential pathogenicity of the c.26C >T variant in MDH2. A total of 32 nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 610 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to rFSGS were identified. DEGs are mainly enriched in the immune and metabolomic-related pathways. A variant in MDH2, c.26C >T, was found in all patients with rFSGS, which was also accompanied by lower levels of mRNA expression in PBMCs from relapsed patients compared with patients with remission after KTx. Functionally, co-cultures of HMy2.CIR cells overexpressing the mutant MDH2 significantly inhibited the expression of synaptopodin, podocin, and F-actin by podocytes compared with those co-cultured with WT HMy2.CIR cells or podocytes alone. We identified that MDH2 is a novel rFSGS susceptibility gene in patients with recurrence of FSGS after KTx. Mutation of the MDH2 c.26C >T variant may contribute to progressive podocyte injury in rFSGS patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".