Abstract A024: <i>In vitro</i> efficacy of a novel dual PARP-HDAC inhibitor in ewing sarcoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Inhibition of poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) is an effective therapy against cancers with DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiencies, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 defects. In preclinical studies, PARP inhibitors demonstrated potential therapeutic value in Ewing sarcoma (ES), though clinical trials with olaparib failed to show significant clinical benefit. While single agent therapy proved inefficacious in the clinical treatment of ES, combination therapies may show anti-tumour activity. A key regulatory event in DNA damage repair is acetylation and deacetylation of histones, controlled by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Increased expression of HDACs have been correlated to more malignant phenotypes in sarcomas and inhibition of HDAC in ES has been shown to be effective in inhibiting tumor growth. HDAC inhibition combined with PARP inhibition has been shown to sensitize cells to treatment in vitro, however clinically, combination therapies often require sequential administration due to different pharmacokinetic profiles and overlapping toxicities, severely limiting clinical utility. Here, we evaluate the activity and efficacy of a novel bifunctional small-molecule compound designed to have both PARP and HDAC inhibiting activity. Methods: PARP1 activity was measured using the Trevigen Universal Colorimetric PARP Assay Kit and PARP2 activity was measured using the BPS Bioscience PARP2 Colorimetric PARP2 Assay Kit. HDAC activity was measured using HeLa nuclear extracts and a fluorogenic peptide-based biochemical assay. Cell survival EC50s were determined using live cell imaging with an Incucyte S3 system and the CellTiter Glo viability assay. Accumulation of phospho-histone H2AX (pH2AX) was detected by western blot using anti-phospho histone H2AX (Ser139) antibody from Cell Signaling Technologies. Results: A representative compound from the kt-3000 series showed potent inhibition of PARP1 and PARP2 with IC50 values in the low nM range, comparable to FDA-approved PARP inhibitors. The compound also showed inhibition of HDAC enzymes with IC50 values in the low µM range, slightly lower than the FDA-approved HDAC inhibitor, vorinostat. Cell survival EC50 values were superior to olaparib in ES cell lines in vitro. Treatment with the kt-3000 compound also resulted in the increased accumulation of pH2AX by western blot and increased S and G2/M cell cycle arrest compared to olaparib. Conclusion: Our kt-3000 compound shows potent inhibition of PARP1, PARP2, and HDAC, as well as induction of DNA damage and cell cycle arrest. Further development of these bifunctional single molecule inhibitors may result in a novel treatment opportunity for Ewing sarcoma. Citation Format: Sarah Truong, Beibei Zhai, Fariba Ghaidi, Louise Ramos, Jay Joshi, Dennis Brown, Neil Sankar, John Langlands, Jeffrey Bacha, Wang Shen, Poul Sorensen, Mads Daugaard. In vitro efficacy of a novel dual PARP-HDAC inhibitor in ewing sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr A024.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".