MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PR010: Development of a pre-clinical metastatic model of human sarcoma to identify therapeutic targets

2022· article· en· W4296131130 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janai R. Carr

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcomaMedicineMetastasisDiseaseMesenchymal stem cellCancer researchIn vivoRadiation therapyCancerOncologyPathologyBioinformaticsInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Targeted therapies have led to significant advances in the treatment of multiple tumor types resulting in more effective and often, less toxic therapeutic options. In sarcomas, the development of targeted therapies has been met limited success. There are more than 70 sarcoma subtypes that vary in histology, clinical course and patient demographics. Despite these clear differences, clinically, sarcomas are treated similarly with variable efficacy. Patients with localized disease are treated with surgery, radiation, and often chemotherapy. Even with this aggressive multimodality treatment, 35% of patients will develop incurable metastatic disease. This highlights the need for additional therapies targeting micrometastatic disease or cells within the primary tumor with a high propensity for metastasis. Understanding the pathways driving the formation of sarcoma metastasis would allow for the development of new therapies. Targeted treatments are limited due to the heterogeneity of the disease and the paucity of pre-clinical models that accurately reflect the human disease. We have focused on creating in vivo models of sarcoma development and metastasis that can be used as the basis of further studies and to test potential therapeutic targets. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the presumed cell of origin for sarcomas and therefore, the starting cell for our investigations. We hypothesized that by recreating key genetic events in human MSCs, we could generate sarcomas in vivo that are reflective of the human disease. RB1 and P53, tumor suppressors that are often mutated or functionally inactive in sarcomas were first targeted using CRISPR-Cas9 technology in MSCs that have been immortalized by human telomerase (hTERT). Genes that are overexpressed or amplified in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data were identified and a library of potential oncogenes was generated. This library was then added to RB1-/-P53+/- cells through lentiviral transduction. Targeting of key tumor suppressors and adding oncogenic drivers resulted in the formation of high-grade human sarcomas subcutaneously. We then sought to investigate the ability of these cells to metastasize. Injection of cells intramuscularly (into the thigh) in immunocompromised mice resulted in the formation of spontaneous lung metastasis without clear evidence of disease in other organs. This pattern clinically reflects that of human disease. Comparing oncogenic genes from metastatic outgrowths to primary tumors identified KLF4, DDIT3, JUN, and KRAS as being enriched in metastatic cells. This system allows for reproducible and robust genetic manipulation of tumor cells to characterize key drivers of metastatic growth. This will result in the identification and validation of new therapeutic targets to treat or prevent metastatic disease in our patients. Citation Format: Janai R. Carr-Ascher. Development of a pre-clinical metastatic model of human sarcoma to identify therapeutic targets [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PR010.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.323
GPT teacher head0.562
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207