MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B021: Long non-coding RNAs that are required for robust cell growth in ewing Sarcoma

2022· article· en· W4296131311 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcela C. Briones Martin del Campo, Alex Lee, Max A. Horlbeck, Truc Dinh, Marta Roman-Moreno, Leanne C. Sayles, Bokyung Seong, Kimberly Stegmaier, Luke A. Gilbert, E. Alejandro Sweet‐Cordero

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySarcomaLong non-coding RNACancer researchEwing's sarcomaCell growthOncogenePhenotypeGAS5FLI1Synovial sarcomaDownregulation and upregulationCellGeneGeneticsCell cycleMedicinePathologyTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are upregulated in many cancers, their role in pediatric cancers is unclear. Among pediatric cancers, Ewing sarcoma is unique in that these tumors show upregulation of a large, specific number of lncRNAs. To perform an unbiased screen of lncRNA function in Ewing sarcoma, we used a pooled CRISPRi screen to identify lncRNAs that modify cell growth. We included in the pooled library lncRNAs either highly expressed in Ewing Sarcoma or directly regulated by the driving oncogene in Ewing Sarcoma, EWS-FLI. We identified 49 lncRNAs that when inhibited by CRISPRi led to decreased growth of Ewing cell lines. Among those that scored most significantly were the small nucleolar host genes SNHG1, SNHG12, and SNHG30. To validate the screening results, we individually cloned the two most depleted sgRNAs targeting for each of these three lncRNAs into a lentiviral vector. We expressed these sgRNAs in three different dCas9-KRAB+ Ewing cell lines and used internally controlled growth assays to test whether the observed phenotypes from the screens were reproducible. We confirmed that for all three lncRNAs hits significantly affected Ewing’s growth, and their depletion leads to an increase in apoptosis. To determine how lncRNAs influence the ability of Ewing sarcoma cells to growth and survive in vivo, we performed a subcutaneous xenograft CRISPRi screen using the same pooled library used in vitro. The lncRNAs with the strongest pro-growth phenotype after knock-down were PVT1 and the uncharacterized LINC02688. Ongoing studies are directed at determining the Ewing-specific role of these lncRNAs. Overall, our studies demonstrate the value of studying lncRNA functions in vitro and in vivo, provides a valuable resource of new lncRNAs targets to further research and establishes a framework for systematic discovery of functional lncRNAs in Ewing cells. Citation Format: Marcela C. Briones Martin del Campo, Alex Lee, Max Horlbeck, Truc Dinh, Marta Roman-Moreno, Leanne Sayles, Bokyung Seong, Kimberly Stegmaier, Luke Gilbert, E. Alejandro Sweet-Cordero. Long non-coding RNAs that are required for robust cell growth in ewing Sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr B021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research→French-language works237,207→