MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A021: Chimeric antigen receptor armored natural killer cell immunotherapy for osteosarcoma

2022· article· en· W4296131450 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gabrielle Robbins, Kenta Yamomoto, Walker S. Lahr, Joseph G. Skeate

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChimeric antigen receptorImmunotherapyNK-92ImmunologyAntibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicityCancer immunotherapyCancer researchAntigenBiologyImmune systemNatural killer T cellT cellAntibodyMedicineMonoclonal antibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Over the last decade, Chimeric Antigen Receptor based T cell (CAR-T) therapy has developed into an effective immunotherapy for several cancers, primarily limited to those of hematological origin. In other cancers, especially solid tumors, CAR-T cell therapies have several shortcomings and clinical success has been underwhelming. Challenges of CAR-T cell therapy include tumor immune evasion through loss of target antigen expression by tumor cells and inhibition of CAR-T cell function by tumor expressed inhibitory molecules. Natural killer (NK) cells present an alternative to T cells that could be more effective due to their ability to perform both antigen dependent and independent killing. NK cells can mediate the direct killing of transformed cells with reduced or absent MHC expression in addition to carrying out antibody dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) of cells bound by antibodies via the NK cell CD16A receptor. Engineering NK cells to express CARs will effectively enable them with additional antigen specific killing. Due to the multiple modalities for cancer cell killing, there is an increased interest in NK cells for cancer immunotherapy. As NK cells are not associated with graft versus host disease, neurotoxicity, long-term autoimmunity, nor cytokine release syndrome, they are more suited for use in allogeneic settings than T cells and have significant clinical potential for use as off-the-shelf products. However, previous publications and clinical trials have demonstrated that the use of unmanipulated NK cells to treat cancer is minimally effective, likely due to limited engraftment, little in vivo expansion or persistence, and suppression by the tumor microenvironment. NK cells activated and expanded with engineered feeder cells expressing membrane bound interleukin-21 (mbIL-21) and 4-1BBL have shown promising results clinically with high-risk myeloid malignancies and preclinically in several solid tumor models. Therefore, we hypothesize that activated/expanded CAR-NK cells that have been genetically edited can be used to successfully treat osteosarcoma, a disease for which patient outcome has not improved in over forty years. Our proposed objective is to evaluate the non-viral KI of several CARs, either alone or in combination, that optimally activate NK cell antigen-specific killing. Genetically engineered CAR-NK cells will be evaluated for enhanced therapeutic efficacy and safety in osteosarcoma models. Our preliminary data strongly supports the hypothesis that CAR-NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy can be fully realized using activated, genome engineered CAR-NK cells. Citation Format: Gabrielle Robbins, Kenta Yamomoto, Walker Lahr, Joseph Skeate. Chimeric antigen receptor armored natural killer cell immunotherapy for osteosarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr A021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.180
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207