MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A011: Emergence of persister cells following bromodomain inhibition in Ewing sarcoma

2022· article· en· W4296131481 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shireen S. Ganapathi, Nicolas M. Garcia, Veerin R. Sirihorachai, Elizabeth R. Lawlor

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBromodomainEpigeneticsReprogrammingBiologyCancer researchSarcomaPopulationBRD4MetastasisBioinformaticsCellMedicineCancerGeneticsPathologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ewing sarcoma (ES) is driven by the tumor initiating fusion EWS::FLI1 that causes widespread transcriptional dysregulation via epigenetic reprogramming. ES cells are highly plastic and heterogenous and have features of both neural crest and mesenchymal lineages. Epigenetic plasticity is well established as a mediator of disease progression and drug resistance, leading to the creation of heterogeneous tumor cell subpopulations that can initiate metastasis and relapse. Successful therapeutic strategies for metastatic or relapsed ES patients are limited and unchanged in the last three decades. Identification of new therapeutic strategies, and defining the effect of new agents on ES biology, is critical to improving patient outcomes. Given the epigenetic dependencies of ES, epigenetic modifying agents are an important class of drugs to investigate. The class of bromodomain and extra-terminal domain protein inhibitors (BETi) have shown preclinical efficacy in ES models but drug combinations will be needed. We are testing the hypothesis that transcriptional rewiring downstream of BETi will create new dependencies in ES cells that could be therapeutically exploited with biologically-defined combinations. Our studies show that the BETi, BMS-986158, the first BETi to be tested in pediatric patients, has profound cytostatic effects in preclinical ES models in vitro and in vivo. Our data further reveal that long term exposure to BMS-986158 creates a persister population of cells that reacquires proliferative capacity. We performed RNA-seq studies on parent, acutely treated (72 hours), and persister populations from three ES cell lines to define the effects of short and long term BET inhibition. Exposure to BMS-986158 led to strong inhibition of the EWS::FLI1-activated gene signature that was evident both acutely and in persister cells. Thus, despite continued inhibition of EWS::FLI1 activity, persister cells restored their ability to survive and proliferate. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of transcripts that were significantly altered in persister cells identified gene programs involved in development and lineage commitment, including polycomb targets, suggesting that persister cells may have been rewired to more stem-like states. In addition, in two of the three cell lines, persister cells demonstrated upregulation of MYC target genes and cell cycle programs that were initially repressed by BET inhibition. Ongoing studies are investigating the molecular mechanisms by which MYC programs are reactivated in persister cells. We anticipate that epigenetic reprogramming mediates the transcriptional rewiring of MYC programs in persister cells, thereby escaping the cytostatic effects of continued BET inihbition. By defining these mechanisms we aim to identify new vulnerabilities that can be exploited in the context of BETi combination trials in the future. Citation Format: Shireen S. Ganapathi, Nicolas M. Garcia, Veerin R. Sirihorachai, Elizabeth R. Lawlor. Emergence of persister cells following bromodomain inhibition in Ewing sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr A011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207