MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract IA024: Identification of a “hypoxic secretome” and its role in metastasis

2022· article· en· W4296132100 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T.S. Karin Eisinger, Ying Liu, Ileana Murazzi

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntravasationExtravasationMetastasisBiologyPrimary tumorZebrafishIn vivoTumor microenvironmentCell migrationCancer researchAngiogenesisCellCancerImmunologyTumor cellsGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Only a small percentage of disseminating tumor cells are capable of forming lethal metastatic foci. Though advances in sequencing and genomics have dramatically enhanced our understanding of primary tumor biology and novel target identification, these techniques alone have not proven sufficient to identify the factors that permit metastasis of this small cellular fraction. For example, we observed that in some tumors the major molecular predictor of metastatic potential is HIF1α protein stabilization in response to low intratumoral O2 tension (hypoxia). These observations clearly show that in-depth understanding of environmental signals and subsequent cellular responses is necessary to fully characterize metastatic potential. Consistent with our earlier observations, we discovered that the collagen-modifying enzyme PLOD2, a direct transcriptional target of HIF1α, dramatically enhances both early (cell migration/invasion) and late (extravasation/lung colonization) steps of the metastatic cascade. We previously reported the role of PLOD2 in modulating the primary tumor microenvironment to facilitate cell migration and intravasation. However, the mechanisms by which PLOD2 and tumor associated collagen impact later metastatic stages (i.e., endothelial adherence, extravasation) are unknown- in part because these processes are particularly difficult to simulate in vitro and to visualize in vivo. Therefore, we have developed new models and tools including a zebrafish embryo xenograft system to image migrating and extravasating tumor cells in vivo. This approach allows us to investigate the late metastatic cascade and define the microenvironmental cues that promote tumor cell dissemination. We also observed that PLOD2-modified collagen is secreted into the extracellular milieu during dissemination and weakens endothelial barrier function. We are investigating the role of tumor collagen and PLOD2 in endothelial adherence and extravasation for the purpose of therapeutically targeting the molecular underpinnings of metastases. Our work focuses on soft tissue sarcomas. However, recent studies by other groups have linked PLOD2 and modified collagen to carcinoma metastasis as well, suggesting a broader applicability for our work. Ultimately, we believe these studies will transform our ability to treat and even prevent metastasis, a unique possibility in sarcoma patients due to the relatively long interval between primary tumor diagnosis and metastatic outgrowth in some patients (5-10 years). The tools we have developed and the mechanisms we are pursuing will open new avenues of research that were once inaccessible and lead to novel therapeutic opportunities for the treatment of metastatic disease in multiple cancer contexts. Citation Format: T.S. Karin Eisinger, Ying Liu, Ileana Murazzi. Identification of a “hypoxic secretome” and its role in metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr IA024.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→