Metabotropic glutamate group II receptor activation in the dorsal striatum suppresses the motivation for cocaine in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract After a history of intermittent cocaine intake, rats develop patterns of drug use characteristic of addiction. The dorsal striatum is involved in the increased pursuit of cocaine after intermittent drug self-administration experience. Within the dorsal striatum, chronic cocaine use changes metabotropic glutamate type II receptor (mGlu 2/3 ) density and function. We examined the extent to which activity at these receptors mediates responding for cocaine after intermittent cocaine use. In Experiment 1, male Wistar rats (n = 11) self-administered 0.25 mg/kg/infusion cocaine during 10 daily intermittent access (IntA) sessions (5 min ON/25 min OFF, for 5 h/session). We then examined the effects of intra-dorsal striatum infusions of the mGlu 2/3 receptor agonist LY379268 (0, 1, and 3 μg/hemisphere) on cocaine self-administration under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. We observed a non-significant tendency for LY379268 to reduce responding for cocaine. In Experiment 2, we used a larger sample of male (n = 11) and female (n = 10) rats. Across 10 IntA sessions, the sexes showed similar levels of cocaine intake. Across the sexes, locomotion significantly increased over sessions, suggesting that rats developed psychomotor sensitization to self-administered cocaine. After 10 IntA sessions, intra-dorsal striatum LY379268 significantly reduced breakpoints achieved for cocaine, active lever presses, and cocaine infusions earned under progressive ratio. LY379268 had no effects on locomotion or inactive lever presses, indicating no motor effects. These results suggest that mGlu 2/3 receptor activation in the dorsal striatum suppresses incentive motivation for cocaine, and this holds promise for anti-addiction therapeutics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".