Pathology or expected morphology? Investigating patterns of cortical porosity and trabecularization during infancy and early childhood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increased cortical porosity is associated with a heightened risk of skeletal fragility due to bone loss and structural decay in adults. However, few studies have examined the etiology of cortical porosity in infants and children. This study examines whether age-related changes in femoral growth and locomotor development influence femoral midshaft cortical porosity in a sample of 48 individuals (fetal to 3.99 years) from the 10th-13th century cemetery of St. Étienne de Toulouse, France. Histological sections were prepared and imaged using light microscopy. Midshaft geometric variables such as total area, cortical area, and pore area were calculated using BoneJ. Increased porosity and cortical trabecularization were found to be significantly associated with age, being almost exclusively present in individuals aged 0.5-1.99 years. At approximately 6 months of age infants typically begin engaging in regular femoral loading and experience an acceleration in growth. The observed increase in midshaft porosity and trabecularization, therefore, likely results from the reorganization and redistribution of cortical bone, stimulated by increased growth velocity and the onset of weight-bearing activities. The reduction in cortical porosity and trabecularization in individuals aged 2.0-3.99 years indicates that children are approaching some sort of homeostasis as growth velocity slows and their femora adapt to consistent loading. Understanding what expected skeletal development looks like is necessary when conducting bioarcheological studies and this study provides evidence for a pattern of transient midshaft porosity during infancy and early childhood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".