A Framework and Method for Surface Floating Object Detection Based on 6G Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Water environment monitoring has always been an important method of water resource environmental protection. In practical applications, there are problems such as large water bodies, long monitoring periods, and large transmission and processing delays. Aiming at these problems, this paper proposes a framework and method for detecting floating objects on water based on the sixth-generation mobile network (6G). Using satellite remote sensing monitoring combined with ground-truth data, a regression model is established to invert various water parameters. Then, using chlorophyll as the main reference indicator, anomalies are detected, early warnings are given in a timely manner, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are notified through 6G to detect targets in abnormal waters. The target detection method in this paper uses MobileNetV3 to replace the VGG16 network in the single-shot multi-box detector (SSD) to reduce the computational cost of the model and adapt to the computing resources of the UAV. The convolutional block attention module (CBAM) is adopted to enhance feature fusion. A small target data enhancement module is used to enhance the network identification capability in the training process, and the key-frame extraction module is applied to simplify the detection process. The network model is deployed in system-on-a-chip (SOC) using edge computing, the processing flow is optimized, and the image preprocessing module is added. Tested in an edge environment, the improved model has a 2.9% increase in detection accuracy and is 55% higher in detection speed compared with SSD. The experimental results show that this method can meet the real-time requirements of video surveillance target detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".