ONLINE FOUR-SIX RECOLLECTION MODEL AT ST. JOHN'S JUNIOR HIGH CATHOLIC SCHOOL BUMI SERPONG DAMAI
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
St. John's Catholic Junior High School's students are the young generation heading towards a competitive and challenging future in all fields. To deal with present and future situations, they need important values in their life. One of the important values is responsibility. Responsibility is one of the core values of St. John's Catholic School. Today, accountability is one of the virtues that are not easy to be developed. In the current COVID-19 pandemic situation, helping students to be the responsible person is becoming increasingly difficult because teachers cannot accompany them directly. Teachers need to find an effective approach and media. St. John's has a yearly recollection program to build students' values and character, such as responsibility. To answer the problem and at the same time take advantage of the existing opportunities, the community servants of Atma Jaya Unika offer a form of recollection with a new approach, namely the four-sixth online recollection program via Edmodo. This recollection program develops four phases and six steps approach. Students follow the online recollection process from their respective homes. Since the beginning of the recollection process, they are conditioned to be actively involved and maintain this active involvement throughout the recollection process. It is an opportunity for them to own and build the value of responsibility. Edmodo is an educational platform that many schools have used to benefit learning activities. However, Edmodo for the four-sixth recollection model in St. John's Catholic Schools is the first time that has been conducted. The online recollection activity via Edmodo was effective, both by the school and the service team. Based on the recollection process record, students can also show their responsibility. They did and submitted their reflection and other sharing discussion results via Edmodo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it