MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296344981 · doi:10.15353/sankofa.v2/4730

"Formation" Interprets Freedom with Art

2022· article· en· W4296344981 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuanheng Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueSankofa Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInjusticeSociologyPower (physics)PoliticsAestheticsFace (sociological concept)Stereotype (UML)Order (exchange)Media studiesPolitical scienceLawPsychologySocial psychologyArtSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

News and media have infiltrated society in a variety of ways, and political correctness has been instilled into everyone's mind, but does this really bring justice and freedom to people of color or marginalized groups? In fact, implicit targeting and discrimination continue to pervade modern society, because some reports reinforce and imply that injustice is justified and the unscrupulous media always try to confuse the public in the grey area and provoke more disputes in order to seek profit. Most people may have noticed that people of colour and marginalized groups are not really treated fairly, but the voices of most people are not as powerful as those of influential people, such as artists. For example, Beyoncé shows us how she uses art media (music) to export her power and her thoughts with "Formation", which can be extended into three new concepts: the stereotype of Black people on social platforms; the real influence of Black artists; Black women face far more negativity than Black men. It must be emphasized that art always comes from life, and people need to learn how to see the cruel truth through art, and "Formation" just proves this.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSankofa Journal of Interdisciplinary StudiesSame topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207