MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296349381 · doi:10.1080/07373937.2022.2119996

An adaptive fuzzy logic controller for intelligent drying

2022· article· en· W4296349381 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrying Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy logicNeuro-fuzzyComputer scienceAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemFuzzy control systemController (irrigation)DefuzzificationArtificial intelligenceControl engineeringFuzzy clusteringFuzzy set operationsControl theory (sociology)Fuzzy numberData miningEngineeringFuzzy setControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A systematic approach to the design of an adaptive fuzzy logic controller (AFLC) for intelligent drying with a computer vision system (CVS) in a feedback loop is proposed. Developed AFLC is based on an artificial neural network (ANN), geno-fuzzy algorithm, and multi-objective fuzzy cost function. Fuzzy sets for the moisture content and product quality are automatically generated by using principal component analysis (PCA) and fuzzy clustering. In addition, the concept of fuzzy time is introduced to optimize the duration of each control step. The fuzzy rule base for the controller was constructed through a two-stage process of (i) warming-up based on simulation and optimization (offline) and (ii) fine-tuning during real-time drying (online). The application of AFLC for shrimp drying showed advantages of the unsupervised fuzzy logic control, such as decreased drying time, less quality degradation, and smaller energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it