Comparing First- and Second-Season Palivizumab Prophylaxis in Patients with Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease (HSCHD) in the ‘Caress’ Database (2005-2014)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND: Compared with normal children, RSV-related hospi-talization (RSVH) rates in children with HSCHD are 2-4 fold higher even up to 2 years of age with an overall weighted mean mortality rate of 5.2%. Pediatric advisory guidelines recommend prophylaxis against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) for infants with HSCHD. However, current recommendations cast doubt as to whether prophylaxis is beneficial beyond 1 year of age. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there are differences in RSVH in HSCHD infants receiving palivizumab during the first versus second RSV season in the Canadian Registry of palivizumab (CARESS). DESIGN/METHODS: CARESS is a prospective registry of infants who received ≥1 dose of palivizumab at one of 32 sites across Canada during the 2005-2014 RSV seasons. Demographic data were collected at enrollment and respiratory-illness-related hospitalization events recorded monthly. In the event of a hospitalization, the relevant hospital records were reviewed by the site’s research nurse for detailed information on criteria for hospital-ization, length of stay (regular ward vs. ICU), days on respiratory support and/or intubation, and RSV test type and diagnosis. Infants aged <24 months with cyanotic or acyanotic HSCHD were recruited. RESULTS: 1306 (64.9%) of 2013 infants received prophylaxis only for the first season. 707 (35.1%) were prophylaxed during the second season (average age in months: 4.7 [first season] vs 14.7 [second season]). Baseline demographics for both seasons were similar. However, infants aged >1year had a more complicated neonatal course, with significantly longer neonatal length of stay (46.7 versus 25.6 days). Infants received: 4.5±1.4 injections; 90.5% of their expected injections and 88.2% of their injections within the appropriate time intervals. 26 infants in the first year (RSVH rate: 2.26%) and 11 infants in the second year (RSVH rate: 2.09%) were hospitalized. Cox regression analysis showed no significant differences in hazards between infants in their first or second year of prophylaxis in the time to first RSVH (Hazard ratio: 1.4, 95%CI 0.5-4.0, p=0.52) CONCLUSION: Infants enrolled in the CARESS database in the second RSV season had a similar hazard of RSVH as those in the first year of life. These findings suggest that infants aged >1 year with HSCHD who remain unstable, are equally at risk for RSVH and merit palivizumab prophylaxis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".