MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296448752 · doi:10.1080/07038992.2022.2114440

Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Novel Hybridization of Spatial-Spectral-Superpixelwise Principal Component Analysis and Dense 2D-3D Convolutional Neural Network Fusion Architecture

2022· article· en· W4296448752 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Debaleena Datta, Pradeep Kumar Mallick, Deepak Gupta, Gyoo‐Soo Chae

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligencePrincipal component analysisConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceHyperspectral imagingFeature extractionKernel (algebra)PixelDimensionality reductionFeature (linguistics)Convolution (computer science)Block (permutation group theory)Artificial neural networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a hybridized technique named Spatial-Spectral-Superpixelwise PCA-based Dense 2D-3D CNN Fusion Architecture (3SPCA-D-2D-3D-CNN), that deals with the detailed and complex study of dimensionality reduction and classification of Hyperspectal images (HSI). Our work is 2-fold: At first (1), 3SPCA is applied on raw HSI that adopts superpixels-based local reconstruction to filter the images, whereas PCA-based supplementary global features acquire the relevant and low-dimensional local features. Every HSI pixel is reconstituted by the pixels of its closest neighbors in the same superpixel block to reduce noise and improve spatial information. Next, PCA is conducted on every zone and the full HSI to get local and global features. The local-global and spatial-spectral properties are then concatenated. Secondly (2), the D-2D-3D-CNN fusion architecture is made up of three 3D convolution blocks, two 2D convolution blocks with varied kernel sizes and filters, and four fully connected (FC) dense layers, totaling nine distinguishing and information-enriched features. These features can generate precise class labels and apply them to the appropriate landcovers. The proposed method has been applied to three publicly available HSI landcover datasets, the Indian Pines, the Salinas Valley, and the Pavia University. It achieved respectively 98.33%, 99.99%, and 98.73% average accuracy scores. Due to its improved Feature Extraction capacity from a limited number of training samples and its classification performance with fewer epochs, this method outperforms other relevant state-of-the-art CNN-based methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207