Carcinomas With Concurrent Involvement of the Endometrium and Uterine Adnexa—Implications for Pathological Diagnosis and Clinical Management in Current Practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A proportion of endometrial and adnexal carcinomas have concurrent involvement of the other site. In the case of high-grade serous carcinomas involving the tubal epithelium as well as endometrium, distinction of tubo-ovarian high-grade serous from endometrial serous carcinoma can have implications for surgical as well as nonsurgical treatment approaches, including targeted therapies and referral to clinical genetics services. The other situation is involvement of the endometrium and ovary by low-grade endometrioid carcinoma; here separation of high-stage endometrial carcinoma from 2 low-stage, low-grade tumors determines adjuvant treatment decisions. These challenging scenarios are illustrated with case presentations and criteria for pathological reporting while acknowledging uncertainty where this is warranted. It is accepted that these are areas in transition, and any criteria offered are likely to change in the light of new information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".