MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296512036 · doi:10.18548/aspe/0010.13

Physiology related to the use of eCG in beef and dairy cattle

2022· article· en· W4296512036 on OpenAlexaff
R.J. Mapletoft, Pietro Sampaio Baruselli, G. A. Bó

Bibliographic record

VenueSPERMOVA · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquine chorionic gonadotropinEmbryo transferOvulationEstrous cycleBeef cattlePregnancyFollicleBiologyAnimal sciencePregnancy rateEmbryoReproductionEndocrinologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Equine chorionic gonatrophin (eCG) is a high molecular weight glycoprotein produced by endometrial cups in the mare. ECG has primarily LH activity in the mare, but has FSH or LH activity in the cow, depending on the recipient populations in the ovary. Although eCG has been used to induce superovulation in a variety of species, several studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of eCG on fixed-time AI (IATF) programs in beef and dairy cattle, and embryo recipients. Under these circumstances, eCG has stimulated the development of the ovulatory dominant follicle and produced ovulation of a larger follicle, resulting in a larger and more functional LC and longer embryo survival. In suckling beef cows, 400 IU of eCG at the time of removal of a progesterone device resulted in increased conception rates after IATF,and in dairy cattle managed in pastoral systems, the eCG administration resulted in a significant increase in pregnancy rates, especially in cows in anestrus. In embryo recipients, treatment with eCG has resulted in increased pregnancy rates after embryo transfer. This presentation will review some of this data and explore strategies to use the potential benefits of eCG to improve bovine reproduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPERMOVASame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207