PSXIII-B-14 Investigation of the Blood Transcriptome of Young Healthy Pigs to Identify Genetic Indicators for Disease Resilience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The objective of this study was to investigate the genetic control of the blood transcriptome of young healthy pigs (~27 days of age) to identify genetic indicators for disease resilience. We estimated the heritability of the expression of 16,545 genes and their genetic correlations with 26 measures of performance and resilience before and after exposure to a natural polymicrobial disease challenge. Weaned barrows (n=3,205, Yorkshire*Landrace, 50 batches) from healthy multiplier farms were evaluated for disease resilience in an experimental facility consisting of a high-health quarantine nursery and a challenge nursery and finisher. All pigs were genotyped with a 650k array. Blood samples collected on 1,591 pigs in the quarantine nursery were used for 3’mRNA sequencing and analysis of white blood cell (WBC) counts. Heritability of gene expression was estimated using mixed linear models with (WI) or without (WO) accounting for WBC. The number of genes with significantly heritable expression levels (p< 0.05) was similar for the WI (4,994) and WO models (5,515). Genes with heritable expression levels were significantly enriched for biological processes such as cell activation, immune system process, stress response, and leukocyte activation (q< 1.0×10-7). One genomic region with heritable expression levels, based on average heritability estimates of genes in windows of 0.5Mb, overlapped with the major histocompatibility complex. Significant genetic correlations (p< 0.05) were observed with all recorded phenotypes but not beyond expected false discovery rates (FDR). However, enrichment analysis of genes ranked by estimates of genetic correlations with recorded phenotypes revealed 7 significant GO biological processes (FDR< 0.05), of which 5 were related to innate and/or adaptive immunity. These results suggest that expression levels in blood of young healthy pigs for genes in specific biological pathways have potential as indicator traits to select for disease resilience. Funding from USDA-NIFA #2017-67007-26144, Genome Canada, Genome Alberta, and PigGen Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".