MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296620234 · doi:10.1093/jas/skac247.138

149 Differences in Gene Expression Following Natural Exposure to Gastrointestinal Parasites between Sheep Selected for High Innate Responses and High Antibody-Mediated Adaptive Immune Responses

2022· article· en· W4296620234 on OpenAlexaff
Olivia Willoughby, Emma Borkowski, S. E. Dixon, Samla M F Cunha, Victoria Asselstine, Andrew S Perergrine, Paula Menzies, Niel A. Karrow, Ángela Cánovas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicHelminth infection and control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyInnate immune systemImmune systemTranscriptomeBreedAntibodyImmunologyGeneGene expressionAnimal scienceGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Parasitism by gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) is a major source of morbidity and mortality for sheep flocks grazed on pasture. Since there is evidence for genetic resistance to GINs in some sheep breeds, genetic selection for immunologic resistance to GIN is a possible management strategy. This study sought to identify differences at the transcriptome level between Ridau-Arcott sheep characterized as high innate immune responders (IIRs, n=5) or high antibody-mediated immune responders (AbMIRs, n=5) following natural exposure to and infection with GINs after spending the summer on GIN-infested pasture; infection was confirmed with individual fecal egg counts. The transcriptomes of the high IIR and high AbMIR animals were also compared with GIN-naïve sheep of the same breed (all medium IIR and AbMIR responders, n = 7). Liver tissue samples from the 17 animals were used to perform transcriptomic analyses using RNA-Sequencing technology. The CLC Genomics Workbench 20.0.4 (CLC Bio, Aarhaus, Denmark) software was used to map reads to the most recent ovine reference genome (Oar rambouillet.v1.0.105), and for differential gene expression analysis. In total, 144 differentially expressed genes (DEG) were found between the high IIRs and the high AbMIRs (FDR< 0.05, and fold change (FC) abs > 2). When compared to the naïve animals, 136 and 53 DEG were found between them and the high IIRs and the high AbMIRs, respectively. In order to verify their function in the host immune response to GINs, functional enrichment analyses were performed on these candidate genes using the AmiGO2 software. Monocarboxilic acid metabolism was identified as an enriched biological process (FDR < 0.05), and ammonia-lyase activity and metalloendopeptidase activity were enriched molecular functions between the high IIR and high AbMIR animals (FDR < 0.05). These preliminary results improve understanding of how host resistance to GINs is genetically regulated through the innate and adaptive immune systems in sheep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicHelminth infection and controlFrench-language works237,207